<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com">
<title>Personality and Social Psychology Review recent issues</title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com</link>
<description>Personality and Social Psychology Review RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Personality and Social Psychology Review</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1088-8683</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/199?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/248?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/280?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/12/3/307?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/99?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/118?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/141?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/168?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/22?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/50?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/73?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/328?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/364?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/11/4/389?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://psr.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title>
<url>http://psr.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/199?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Measuring Culture Outside the Head: A Meta-Analysis of Individualism--Collectivism in Cultural Products]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/199?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Although cultural psychology is the study of how sociocultural environments and psychological processes coconstruct each other, the field has traditionally emphasized measures of the psychological over the sociocultural. Here, the authors call attention to a growing trend of measuring the sociocultural environment. They present a quantitative review of studies that measure cultural differences in "cultural products": tangible, public representations of culture such as advertising or popular texts. They found that cultural products that come from Western cultures (mostly the United States) are more individualistic, and less collectivistic, than cultural products that come from collectivistic cultures (including Korea, Japan, China, and Mexico). The effect sizes for cultural products were larger than self-report effect sizes for this dimension (reported in Oyserman, Coon, &amp; Kemmelmeier, 2002). In addition to presenting this evidence, the authors highlight the importance of studying the dynamic relationships between sociocultural environments and psyches.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morling, B., Lamoreaux, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308318260</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Measuring Culture Outside the Head: A Meta-Analysis of Individualism--Collectivism in Cultural Products]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>This article presents a tripartite model of identity that integrates cognitive, social, and cultural levels of analysis in a multimethod framework. With a focus on content, structure, and process, identity is defined as ideology cognized through the individual engagement with discourse, made manifest in a personal narrative constructed and reconstructed across the life course, and scripted in and through social interaction and social practice. This approach to the study of identity challenges personality and social psychologists to consider a cultural psychology framework that focuses on the relationship between master narratives and personal narratives of identity, recognizes the value of a developmental perspective, and uses ethnographic and idiographic methods. Research in personality and social psychology that either explicitly or implicitly relies on the model is reviewed.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hammack, P. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308316892</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>247</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/248?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/248?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Despite a substantial literature examining personality, prejudice, and related constructs such as Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) and Social Dominance Orientation (SDO), there have been no systematic reviews in this area. The authors reviewed and meta-analyzed 71 studies (</I>N = <I>22,068 participants) investigating relationships between Big Five dimensions of personality, RWA, SDO, and prejudice. RWA was predicted by low Openness to Experience but also Conscientiousness, whereas SDO was predicted by low Agreeableness and also weakly by low Openness to Experience. Consistent with a dual-process motivational model of ideology and prejudice, the effects of Agreeableness on prejudice were fully mediated by SDO, and those of Openness to Experience were largely mediated by RWA. Finally, the effects of Agreeableness and Openness to Experience were robust and consistent across samples, although subtle moderating factors were identified, including differences in personality inventory (NEO Personality Inventory&mdash;Revised vs. Big Five Inventory), differences across prejudice domain, and cross-cultural differences in Conscientiousness and Neuroticism. Implications for the study of personality and prejudice are discussed.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sibley, C. G., Duckitt, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308319226</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Personality and Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>279</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>248</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/280?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Toward a Unifying Model of Identification With Groups: Integrating Theoretical Perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/3/280?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Building on the contributions of diverse theoretical approaches, the authors present a multidimensional model of group identification. Integrating conceptions from the social identity perspective with those from research on individualism&mdash;collectivism, nationalism&mdash; patriotism, and identification with organizations, we propose four conceptually distinct modes of identification: importance (how much I view the group as part of who I am), commitment (how much I want to benefit the group), superiority (how much I view my group as superior to other groups), and deference (how much I honor, revere, and submit to the group's norms, symbols, and leaders). We present an instrument for assessing the four modes of identification and review initial empirical findings that validate the proposed model and show its utility in understanding antecedents and consequences of identification.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., Eidelson, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308319225</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Toward a Unifying Model of Identification With Groups: Integrating Theoretical Perspectives]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>306</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>280</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/12/3/307?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Announcement: The Society for Personality and Social Psychology's Student Publication Award]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/12/3/307?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308321968</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Announcement: The Society for Personality and Social Psychology's Student Publication Award]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>307</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>307</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/99?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Functional Framework for the Influence of Implicit and Explicit Motives on Autobiographical Memory]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/99?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>A functional framework explains the influence of implicit and explicit motives on autobiographical memory. Personality motives at different levels of awareness are differentially activated by the social context and, in turn, engage memory processes. Research shows that these motives influence both what and how autobiographical events are remembered. Specifically, implicit motives modulate encoding and recall of emotional experiences, vivid memories, and event-specific knowledge through nonconscious organizing strategies that facilitate affective end states. Explicit motives modulate encoding and recall of events linked to self-concept stability change, as well as routine experiences and general event scripts that represent typical self-attributed behaviors that facilitate the attainment of current goals. Research from narrative essays, self-report data, and controlled experiments demonstrates that implicit and explicit motives have a differential influence on each step of the memory process. An integrative framework explains this research from a functional perspective.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Woike, B. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308315701</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Functional Framework for the Influence of Implicit and Explicit Motives on Autobiographical Memory]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>117</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>99</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/118?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Costs of Benefits: Help-Refusals Highlight Key Trade-Offs of Social Life]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/118?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Social living provides opportunities for cooperative interdependence and concomitant opportunities to obtain help from others in times of need. Nevertheless, people frequently refuse help from others, even when it would be beneficial. Decisions to accept or reject aid offers may provide a window into the adaptive trade-offs recipients make between costs and benefits in different key domains of social life. Following from evolutionary and ecological perspectives, we consider how help-recipient decision making might reflect qualitatively different threats to goal attainment within six fundamental domains of social life (coalition formation, status, self-protection, mate acquisition, mate retention, and familial care). Accepting help from another person is likely to involve very different threats and opportunities depending on which domains are currently active. This approach can generate a variety of novel empirical predictions and suggest new implications for the delivery of aid.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ackerman, J. M., Kenrick, D. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308315700</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Costs of Benefits: Help-Refusals Highlight Key Trade-Offs of Social Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>118</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/141?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/141?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>An integrative framework is proposed for understanding how multiple biological and psychological systems are regulated in the context of adult attachment relationships, dysregulated by separation and loss experiences, and, potentially, re-regulated through individual recovery efforts. Evidence is reviewed for a coregulatory model of normative attachment, defined as a pattern of interwoven physiology between romantic partners that results from the conditioning of biological reward systems and the emergence of felt security within adult pair bonds. The loss of coregulation can portend a state of biobehavioral dysregulation, ranging from diffuse psychophysiological arousal and disorganization to a full-blown (and highly organized) stress response. The major task for successful recovery is adopting a self-regulatory strategy that attenuates the dysregulating effects of the attachment disruption. Research evidence is reviewed across multiple levels of analysis, and the article concludes with a series of testable research questions on the interconnected nature of attachment, loss, and recovery processes.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sbarra, D. A., Hazan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308315702</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Coregulation, Dysregulation, Self-Regulation: An Integrative Analysis and Empirical Agenda for Understanding Adult Attachment, Separation, Loss, and Recovery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>167</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>141</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/168?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/2/168?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Counterfactuals are thoughts about alternatives to past events, that is, thoughts of what might have been. This article provides an updated account of the functional theory of counterfactual thinking, suggesting that such thoughts are best explained in terms of their role in behavior regulation and performance improvement. The article reviews a wide range of cognitive experiments indicating that counterfactual thoughts may influence behavior by either of two routes: a content-specific pathway (which involves specific informational effects on behavioral intentions, which then influence behavior) and a content-neutral pathway (which involves indirect effects via affect, mind-sets, or motivation). The functional theory is particularly useful in organizing recent findings regarding counterfactual thinking and mental health. The article concludes by considering the connections to other theoretical conceptions, especially recent advances in goal cognition.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Epstude, K., Roese, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868308316091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>168</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Cognitive Basis of Trait Anger and Reactive Aggression: An Integrative Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Cognitive processing approaches to personality have gained momentum in recent years, and the present review uses such a cognitive approach to understand individual differences in anger and reactive aggression. Because several relevant cognitive models have been proposed in separate literatures, a purpose of this review is to integrate such material and evaluate the consistency of relations obtained to date. The analysis reveals that processes related to automatic hostile interpretations, ruminative attention, and effortful control appear to be important contributors to individual differences in angry reactivity. Memory accessibility processes, by contrast, failed to exhibit a consistent relationship with trait anger. This review concludes with the proposal of an integrative cognitive model of trait anger and the discussion of several broader issues, including the developmental origins of cognitive processing patterns and plausible links to temperament-based perspectives.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilkowski, B. M., Robinson, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307309874</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Cognitive Basis of Trait Anger and Reactive Aggression: An Integrative Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>21</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/22?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/22?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>This article expands the view of groups as information processors into a motivated information processing in groups (MIP-G) model by emphasizing, first, the mixed-motive structure of many group tasks and, second, the idea that individuals engage in more or less deliberate information search and processing. The MIP-G model postulates that social motivation drives the kind of information group members attend to, encode, and retrieve and that epistemic motivation drives the degree to which new information is sought and attended to, encoded, and retrieved. Social motivation and epistemic motivation are expected to influence, alone and in combination, generating problem solutions, disseminating information, and negotiating joint decisions. The MIP-G model integrates the influence of many individual and situational differences and combines insight on human thinking with group-level interaction process and decision making.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., van Knippenberg, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307304092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>49</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/50?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/50?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Although past research has demonstrated a positive relationship between collective identification and normative conformity, there may be circumstances in which strongly identified members do not conform but instead choose to challenge group norms. This article proposes a normative conflict model, which distinguishes between nonconformity due to dissent (challenging norms to change them) and nonconformity due to disengagement (distancing oneself from the group). The normative conflict model predicts that strongly identified members are likely to challenge group norms when they experience conflict between norms and important alternate standards for behavior, in particular when they perceive norms as being harmful to the group. Data in support of the model are reviewed, mechanisms by which external variables may influence dissent in social groups are elaborated, and the model is linked to contemporary perspectives on collective identity.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Packer, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307309606</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>72</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>50</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/73?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Language, Meaning, and Social Cognition]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/1/73?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Social cognition is meant to examine the process of meaningful social interaction. Despite the central involvement of language in this process, language has not received the focal attention that it deserves. Conceptualizing meaningful social interaction as the process of construction and exchange of meaning, the authors argue that language can be productively construed as a semiotic tool, a tool for meaning making and exchange, and that language use can produce unintended consequences in its users. First, the article shows a particular instance of language use to be a collaborative process that influences the representation of meaning in the speaker, the listener, and the collective that includes both the speaker and listener. It then argues that language use and social cognition may have reciprocal effects in the long run and may have significant implications for generating and maintaining cultural differences in social cognition.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holtgraves, T. M., Kashima, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-01-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307309605</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Language, Meaning, and Social Cognition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>12</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>94</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>73</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Physiology of Willpower: Linking Blood Glucose to Self-Control]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Past research indicates that self-control relies on some sort of limited energy source. This review suggests that blood glucose is one important part of the energy source of self-control. Acts of self-control deplete relatively large amounts of glucose. Self-control failures are more likely when glucose is low or cannot be mobilized effectively to the brain (i.e., when insulin is low or insensitive). Restoring glucose to a sufficient level typically improves self-control. Numerous self-control behaviors fit this pattern, including controlling attention, regulating emotions, quitting smoking, coping with stress, resisting impulsivity, and refraining from criminal and aggressive behavior. Alcohol reduces glucose throughout the brain and body and likewise impairs many forms of self-control. Furthermore, self-control failure is most likely during times of the day when glucose is used least effectively. Self-control thus appears highly susceptible to glucose. Self-control benefits numerous social and interpersonal processes. Glucose might therefore be related to a broad range of social behavior.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307303030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Physiology of Willpower: Linking Blood Glucose to Self-Control]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>327</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/328?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/328?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>Three separate sets of meta-analyses were conducted of studies testing for gender differences in adults' talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Across independent samples, statistically significant but negligible average effects sizes were obtained with all three language constructs: Contrary to the prediction, men were more talkative (</I>d = <I>&mdash;.14) than were women. As expected, men used more assertive speech (</I>d = <I>.09), whereas women used more affiliative speech (</I>d = <I>.12). In addition, 17 moderator variables were tested that included aspects of the interactive context (e.g., familiarity, gender composition, activity), measurement qualities (e.g., operational definition, observation length), and publication characteristics (e.g., author gender, publication source). Depending on particular moderators, more meaningful effect sizes (</I>d > <I>.2) occurred for each language construct. In addition, the direction of some gender differences was significantly reversed under particular conditions. The results are interpreted in relation to social-constructionist, socialization, and biological interpretations of gender-related variations in social behavior.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leaper, C., Ayres, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307302221</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Variations in Adults' Language Use: Talkativeness, Affiliative Speech, and Assertive Speech]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>363</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>328</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/364?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/4/364?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><I>This article presents a model of social identity development and integration in the self. Classic intergroup theories (e.g., social identity theory, self-categorization theory) address the situational, short-term changes in social identities. Although these theories identify the contextual and environmental factors that explain situational changes in social identification, the intraindividual processes underlying developmental changes in social identities and their integration within the self remain to be identified. Relying on recent intergroup models as well as on developmental (i.e., neo-Piagetian) and social cognitive frameworks, this article proposes a four-stage model that explains the specific processes by which multiple social identities develop intraindividually and become integrated within the self over time. The factors that facilitate versus impede these identity change processes and the consequences associated with social identity integration are also presented.</I></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amiot, C. E., de la Sablonniere, R., Terry, D. J., Smith, J. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307304091</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>388</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>364</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/11/4/389?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Society for Personality and Social Psychology's Student Publication Award]]></title>
<link>http://psr.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/11/4/389?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-10-12</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/1088868307306907</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Society for Personality and Social Psychology's Student Publication Award]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>11</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>389</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>389</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>