This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1088868307309606v1 12/1/50    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Packer, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Packer, D. J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups

The Ohio State University

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: packer.32{at}osu.edu.

	Abstract

Although past research has demonstrated a positive relationship between collective identification and normative conformity, there may be circumstances in which strongly identified members do not conform but instead choose to challenge group norms. This article proposes a normative conflict model, which distinguishes between nonconformity due to dissent (challenging norms to change them) and nonconformity due to disengagement (distancing oneself from the group). The normative conflict model predicts that strongly identified members are likely to challenge group norms when they experience conflict between norms and important alternate standards for behavior, in particular when they perceive norms as being harmful to the group. Data in support of the model are reviewed, mechanisms by which external variables may influence dissent in social groups are elaborated, and the model is linked to contemporary perspectives on collective identity.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?