|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 1, No. 1,
3-25 (1997)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space
John T. Cacioppo
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus
Wendi L. Gardner
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University
Gary G. Berntson
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus
All organisms must be capable of differentiating hostile from hospitable stimuli to survive. Typically, this evaluative discrimination is conceptualized as being bipolar (hostile-hospitable). This conceptualization is certainly evident in the area of attitudes, where the ubiquitous bipolar attitude measure, by gauging the net affective predisposition toward a stimulus, treats positive and negative evaluative processes as equivalent, reciprocally activated, and interchangeable. Contrary to conceptualizations of this evaluative process as bipolar, recent evidence suggests that distinguishable motivational systems underlie assessments of the positive and negative significance of a stimulus. Thus, a stimulus may vary in terms of the strength of positive evaluative activation and the strength of negative evaluative activation it evokes. Low activation of positive and negative evaluative processes by a stimulus reflects attitude neutrality or indifference, whereas high activation of positive and negative evaluative processes reflects attitude ambivalence. As such, attitudes can be represented more completely within a bivariate space than along a bipolar continuum. Evidence is reviewed showing that the positive and negative evaluative processes underlying many attitudes are distinguishable (stochastically and functionally independent), are characterized by distinct activation functions (positivity offset and negativity bias principles), are related differentially to attitude ambivalence (corollary of ambivalence asymmetries), have distinguishable antecedents (heteroscedacity principle), and tend to gravitate from a bivariate toward a bipolar structure when the underlying beliefs are the target of deliberation or a guide for behavior (principle of motivational certainty). The implications for societal phenomena such as political elections and democratic structures are discussed.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
B. Gawronski and E. Walther
The TAR Effect: When the Ones Who Dislike Become the Ones Who Are Disliked
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
September 1, 2008;
34(9):
1276 - 1289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Cohen and K. S. Minor
Emotional Experience in Patients With Schizophrenia Revisited: Meta-analysis of Laboratory Studies
Schizophr Bull,
June 17, 2008;
(2008)
sbn061v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xiaoquan Zhao and Xiaomei Cai
The Role of Ambivalence in College Nonsmokers' Information Seeking and Information Processing
Communication Research,
June 1, 2008;
35(3):
298 - 318.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. E. Romero and C. C. Epkins
Girls' cognitions of hypothetical friends: Are they related to depression, loneliness, social anxiety and perceived similarity?
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
April 1, 2008;
25(2):
311 - 332.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Li, R. E. Zinbarg, S. G. Boehm, and K. A. Paller
Neural and behavioral evidence for affective priming from unconsciously perceived emotional facial expressions and the influence of trait anxiety.
J. Cogn. Neurosci.,
January 1, 2008;
20(1):
95 - 107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. N. Elliott, M. K. Beckett, D. E. Kanouse, K. Hambarsoomians, and S. Bernard
Problem-Oriented Reporting of CAHPS Consumer Evaluations of Health Care
Med Care Res Rev,
October 1, 2007;
64(5):
600 - 614.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. R. Maio and G. Thomas
The Epistemic-Teleologic Model of Deliberate Self-Persuasion
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2007;
11(1):
46 - 67.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Craig, M. D. Martinez, and J. G. Kane
Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens' Ambivalence about Gay Rights
Political Research Quarterly,
March 1, 2005;
58(1):
5 - 17.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. K. Kachadourian, F. Fincham, and J. Davila
Attitudinal Ambivalence, Rumination, and Forgiveness of Partner Transgressions in Marriage
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2005;
31(3):
334 - 342.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Nezlek and S. L. Gable
Depression as a Moderator of Relationships between Positive Daily Events and Day-to-Day Psychological Adjustment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2001;
27(12):
1692 - 1704.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Rozin and E. B. Royzman
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
November 1, 2001;
5(4):
296 - 320.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. R. Maio, F. D. Fincham, and E. J. Lycett
Attitudinal Ambivalence Toward Parents and Attachment Style
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2000;
26(12):
1451 - 1464.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. T. Reis, K. M. Sheldon, S. L. Gable, J. Roscoe, and R. M. Ryan
Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
April 1, 2000;
26(4):
419 - 435.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Nelson and K. Klutas
The Distinctiveness Effect in Social Interaction: Creation of a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
January 1, 2000;
26(1):
126 - 135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Huelsman, R. C. Nemanick JR., and D. C. Munz
Scales to Measure Four Dimensions of Dispositional Mood: Positive Energy, Tiredness, Negative Activation, and Relaxation
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
October 1, 1998;
58(5):
804 - 819.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Ito, J. T. Cacioppo, and P. J. Lang
Eliciting Affect Using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through Evaluative Space
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
August 1, 1998;
24(8):
855 - 879.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
