Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dweck, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dweck, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 156-168 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_6

Static Versus Dynamic Theories and the Perception of Groups: Different Routes to Different Destinations

Sheri R. Levy

Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Jason E. Plaks

Department of Psychology, University of Washington

Ying-yi Hong

Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Chi-yue Chiu

Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong

Carol S. Dweck

Department of Psychology, Columbia University

Research on lay theories suggests that people who begin the task of social perception with different starting assumptions follow different cognitive paths and reach different social endpoints. In this article, we show how laypeople's fixed (entity) versus dynamic (incremental) theories of human nature foster different meaning systems for interpreting and respondingto the same group information. Using research with adults and children, in the United States and East Asia, and concerning familiar and novel groups, wedocument how these theories influence susceptibility to stereotyping, perceptions of group homogeneity, the ultimate attribution error, intergroup bias,and discriminatory behavior. Further, we discuss social-cultural factors that produce and perpetuate these theories as well as why and when these theories are maintained and changed. The implications of this work for reducing stereotyping and intergroup conflict are considered.

References

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  • Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1985). The group attribution error. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 563-579.[CrossRef]
  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Begue, L., & Apostolidis, T. (in press). Implicit theories of reality and social differentiation from homosexuals. Journal of Social Psychology
  • Bigler, R. S. (1995). The role of classification skill in moderating environmental effects on children's gender stereotyping: A study of the functional use of gender in the classroom. Child Development, 66, 1072-1087.[CrossRef]
  • Bigler, R. S., Jones, L. C., & Lobliner, D. B. (1997). Social categorization and the formation of intergroup attitudes in children. Child Development, 68, 530-543.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1987). Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 871-880.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. S. (1985). Effects of stereotypes in decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 267-282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.[Abstract]
  • Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
  • Chiu, C. (1994). Bases of categorization and person cognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
  • Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, Y. Y., & Fu, H. Y. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923-940.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Social identification in a political transition: The role of implicit beliefs. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 297-318.[CrossRef]
  • Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism, culture and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Chow, A. P. Y. (1996). Implicit theories and intergroup perception. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
  • Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination: Another look. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). New York: Guilford.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.[CrossRef]
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approachto motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 25, 109-116.
  • Erdley, C. A., & Dweck, C. S. (1993). Children's implicit personality theories as predictors of their social judgments. Child Development, 64, 863-878.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic.
  • Fletcher, G. J. O., Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875-884.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ford, T. E.. & Stangor, C. (1992). The role of diagnosticity in stereotype formation: Perceiving group means and variances. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 63, 356-367.
  • Freitas, A. L., Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (1997, May). Implicit theories predict behavioral stereotyping in a prisoner's dilemma game Paper presented at the eighth annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K. M., & McGlynn, E. A. (2000). Reducing intergroup conflict: From superordinate goals to decategorization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamics, 4, 98-114.[CrossRef]
  • Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 54, 733-740.
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Ruvolo, C. M. (1990). Stereotype-based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 35-60.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
  • Herek, G. M. (1987). Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 285-303.[CrossRef]
  • Hewstone, M. (1990). The "ultimate attribution error"? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335.
  • Hewstone, M., Macrae, C., Griffiths, R., & Milne, A. B. (1994). Cognitive models of stereotype change: 5. Measurement, development, and consequences of subtyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 505-526.[CrossRef]
  • Hilton, J. L., Klein, J. G., & von Hippel, W. (1991). Attention allocation and impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 548-559.[Abstract]
  • Höogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
  • Hong, Y. Y. (1994). Predicting trait versus process inferences: The role of implicit theories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
  • Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Yeung, G., & Tong, Y. Y. (1999). Social comparison during the political transition: Interaction of entity versus incremental beliefs and social identities. Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 257-279.[CrossRef]
  • Hong, Y. Y., & Yeung, G. (1997, August). Implicit theories as predictors of stereotyping tendency: The case of intergroup perceptions in Hong Kong Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
  • Johnson, J. A., Gerner, C. K., Efran, J. S., & Overton, W. F. (1988). Personality as a basis for theoretical predilections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 824-835.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception New York: Macmillan
  • Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
  • Kamins, M., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835-847.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Katz, I., & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.[CrossRef]
  • Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
  • Levy, S. R. (1998). Children's static versus dynamic conceptions of people: Their impact on intergroup attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
  • Levy, S. R. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Lessons from social-cognitive factors underlying perceiver differences in prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 745-766.[CrossRef]
  • Levy, S. R. (2000, February). How malleable are theories about the malleability of traits: Implications for perceiving between-group similarity. Paper presented at the first annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Nashville, TN.
  • Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). The impact of children's static versus dynamic conceptions of people on stereotype formation. Child Development, 70, 1163-1180.[CrossRef]
  • Levy, S. R., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Modes of social thought: Implicit theories and social understanding. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 179-202). New York: Guilford.
  • Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.[CrossRef]
  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
  • Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37-47.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1996). Enhancing self-esteem by directed-thinking tasks: Cognitive and affective positivity asymmetries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1117-1125.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Molden, D. C., Plaks, J. E., & Dweck, C. S. (2000). Lay theories and person x situation interactions: Processes of dispositional inference. Manuscript in preparation, Columbia University, New York.
  • Mueller, C., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33-52.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Pepper, S. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.[Abstract]
  • Phillips, S. T., & Ziller, R. C. (1997). Toward a theory and measure of the nature of nonprejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 420-434.[CrossRef]
  • Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1989). Psychogenesis and the history of the sciences (H. Fielder, Trans.). Paris: Flamarion. (Original work published 1983)
  • Plaks, J. E., Grant, H. A., & Dweck, C. S. (2000). The interaction of lay theories and epistemic motivations in the processing of stereotypic and counterstereotypic information. Manuscript in preparation, Columbia University, New York.
  • Plaks, J. E., Stroessner, S. J., Dweck, C. S., & Sherman, J. (in press). Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic vs. counterstereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Personality
  • Pratto, F., & Bargh, J. A. (1991). Stereotyping based upon apparently individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 26-47.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schaller, M., Asp, C., Rosell, M. C., & Heim, S. J. (1996). Training in statistical reasoning inhibits the formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 829-844.[Abstract]
  • Schaller, M., Boyd, C., Yohannes, J., & O'Brien, M. (1995). The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 544-555.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sedikides, C., & Ostrom, T. M. (1993). Perceptions of group variability: Moving from an uncertain crawl to a purposeful stride. Social Cognition, 11, 165-174.[ISI]
  • Su, S. K., Chiu, C., Hong, Y., Leung, K., Peng, K., & Morris, M. W. (1999). Self organization and social organization: American and Chinese constructions. In T. R. Tyler, R. Kramer, & O. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 193-222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiations between social groups. San Diego, CA: Academic.
  • Thagard, P., & Kunda, Z. (1998). Making sense of people: Coherence mechanisms. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and behavior (pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Tong, Y. Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2000). Implicit theories and cognitive organization of impressions. Manuscript in preparation, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.[CrossRef]
  • Unger, R. K., Draper, R. D., & Pendergrass, M. L. (1986). Personal epistemology and personal experience. Journal of Social Issues 42, 67-79.
  • Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1998). The naive scientist revisited: Naive theories and social judgment. Social Cognition, 16, 1-7.
  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. New York: Free Press.
  • Whitehead, A. N. (1938). Modes of thought. New York: Free Press.
  • Wittenbrink, B., Hilton, J. L., & Gist, P. L. (1998). In search of similarity: Stereotypes as naive theories in social categorization. Social Cognition, 16, 31-55.
  • Wright, J. C., & Murphy, G. L. (1984). The utility of theories in intuitive statistics: The robustness of theory-based judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113, 301-322.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Leyens, J. P., & Corneille, O. (1998). Social judgeability and the bogus pipeline: The role of naive theories of judgment in impression formation. Social Cognition, 16, 56-77.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
C. S. K. Poon and D. J. Koehler
Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 965 - 977.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
P. Fischer, T. Greitemeyer, and A. Kastenmuller
What Do We Think About Muslims? The Validity of Westerners' Implicit Theories About the Associations Between Muslims' Religiosity, Religious Identity, Aggression Potential, and Attitudes Toward Terrorism
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2007; 10(3): 373 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. R. Kelly and J. R. Spoor
Naive Theories About the Effects of Mood in Groups: A Preliminary Investigation
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 203 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. S. Friedman, M. L. Cooper, M. R. Chladek, and D. Rudy
Investigating the Link Between Validation Seeking and Lay Dispositionism
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2007; 33(4): 463 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. J. Rydell, K. Hugenberg, D. Ray, and D. M. Mackie
Implicit Theories About Groups and Stereotyping: The Role of Group Entitativity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2007; 33(4): 549 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dweck, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Levy, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dweck, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?