Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yzerbyt, V.
Right arrow Articles by Estrada, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yzerbyt, V.
Right arrow Articles by Estrada, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 141-155 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_5

The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes

Vincent Yzerbyt

Olivier Corneille

Claudia Estrada

Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve

In line with our subjective essentialist view of stereotypes (Yzerbyt, Rocher, & Schadron, 1997), we propose that two classes of factors that mutually reinforce each other influence the perception of groups. The perception of a strong level of similarity and organization among group members (i.e., group entitativity) suggests the existence of a deep essence that would account for the detected regularities. Conversely, the existence of naïve theories regarding the presence of an underlying core encourages the search for resemblances and connections within the group. After a short presentation of the recent literature dealing with the concepts of entitativity and essentialism, we review a series of studies from our laboratory showing the impact of entitativity on essentialism as well as the influence of essentialism on entitativity. We also provide empirical evidence for this bidirectional process from both the outsider and the insider perspective. Finally, we examine the potential role of cultural differences both in the ascription of a fundamental nature to an entitative assembly of people and in the use of a priori naïve theories to create surface similarity among group members. As a set, these efforts point to the importance of taking into account the constant dialogue between perceiver's theory-based explanations and group member's perceptual characteristics if one wishes to understand group stereotypes.

References

  • Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 243-250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Berndsen, M., Spears, R., McGarty, C., & van der Pligt, J. (1998). Dynamics of differentiation: Similarity as the precursor and product of stereotype formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1451-1463.[CrossRef]
  • Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being similar and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.[Abstract]
  • Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 554-594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford.
  • Brewer, M. B., Weber, J. G., & Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 29-40.
  • Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology: The second edition. New York: Free Press.
  • Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioural Sciences, 3, 14-25.
  • Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Bourguignon, D. (1998). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on social identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Tong, J. Y., & Fu, J. H. (1997). Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 923-940.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949-960.[Abstract]
  • Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Nisrezayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47-63.
  • Corneille, O., & Judd, C. M. (1999). Accentuation and sensitization effects in the categorization of multi-faceted stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 927-941.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Buidin, G. (in press). Threat and the group attribution error: When threat elicits judgments of extremity and homogeneity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
  • Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P. (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 991-1003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ddprét, E., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 461-480.[CrossRef]
  • Doosje, B., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Koomen, W. (1999). Perceived group variability in intergroup relations: The distinctive role of social identity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 41-74). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Fiedler, K. (1991). The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: An information loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 24-36.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from daguerrotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 887-889.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Fletcher, G. J. O., & Ward, C. (1988). Attribution theory and processes: A cross-cultural perspective. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Gaertner, L., & Schopler, J. (1998). Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 963-980.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotype judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392-407.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
  • Haslam, S. A., McGarty, C., & Brown, P. M. (1996). The search for differentiated meaning is a precursor to illusory correlation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 611-619.[Abstract]
  • Hirschfeld, L. A. (1995). Do children have a theory of race? Cognition, 54, 209-252.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hirschfeld, L. A. (1996). Race in the making: Cognition, culture, and the child's construction of the human kind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (1998). Differential distrust of groups and individuals. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 75-107). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-24.
  • Jost, J., & Major, B. (in press). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kashima, Y., Siegal, M., Tanaka, K., & Kashima, E. (1992). Do people believe that behaviours are consistent with attitudes? Towards a cultural psychology of attribution processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 111-124.[ISI]
  • Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). Memory-based judgments about multiple categories: A revision and extension of Tajfel's accentuation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 35-47.[CrossRef]
  • Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver's inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340-348.[Abstract]
  • Lee, F., Hallahan, M., & Herzog, T. (1996). Explaining real-life events: How culture and domain shape attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 731-741.
  • Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421-1436.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Leyens, J.-P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186-197.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Schadron, G. (1994). Stereotypes and social cognition. London: Sage.
  • Lickel, B., Hamilton, D., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A. C., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Malt, B. C. (1994). Wateris notH20. Cognitive Psychology, 27,41-70.[CrossRef]
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 750-762.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • McGarty, C., & de la Haye, A.-M. (1997). Stereotype formation: Beyond illusory correlation. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & A. Haslam (Eds.), The psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 144-170). London: Basil Blackwell.
  • McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., & Grace, D. M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 237-256.
  • McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1993). Illusory correlation as accentuation of actual intercategory difference: Evidence for the effect with minimal stimulus information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 391-410.
  • McGarty, C., & Penny, R. E. C. (1988). Categorization, accentuation and social judgement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 147-157.
  • McGarty, C., & Turner, J. C. (1992). The effects of categorization on social judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 253-268.
  • Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosnaidou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179-195). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Menon, T., Morris, M., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1998). Culture and attributions to individuals versus groups: North Americans attribute to personal dispositions; East Asians attribute to dispositions of social collectives. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 961-978.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions of social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structures in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66,574-583.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
  • Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1988). Categories versus groups as explanatory concepts in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 117-123.
  • Rogier, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1999). Social attribution: The role of homogeneity in subjective essentialism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 233-240.[CrossRef]
  • Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ross, L., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977). Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 485-494.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11-36). London: Sage.
  • Rothgerber, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1206-1211.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schaller, M., & Maass, A. (1989). Illusory correlation and social categorization: Toward an integration of motivational and cognitive factors in stereotype formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 709-721.[CrossRef]
  • Semin, G., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.
  • Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group memberships. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80-110). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on the mind, self and emotion (pp. 158-199). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, E. R. (1991). Illusory correlation in a simulated exemplar-based memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 107-123.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Spears, R., Oakes, P., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, A. (1997). The psychology of stereotyping and group life. London: Basil Blackwell.
  • Stroessner, S. J., & Plaks, J. E. (in press). Illusory correlation and stereotype formation: Tracing the arc of research over a quarter century. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: On the tenure andfuture of social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A. L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-114.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Vanbeselaere, N. (1991). The impact of in-group and out-group homogeneity/heterogeneity upon intergroup relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 291-301.[CrossRef]
  • Welbourne, J. L. (1999). The impact of perceived entitivity on inconsistency resolution for groups and individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 481-508.[CrossRef]
  • Wilder, D. A. (1986). Social categorization: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup conflicts. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 293-355). San Diego, CA: Academic.
  • Wilder, D. A., & Simon, A. (1998). The group as a category and an interactive entity: Implications for social perception and intergroup behavior. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Buidin, G. (1998). The impact of naive theories about the nature of the groups on the accentuation effect. Unpublished raw data, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-P., & Paladino, P. M. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 258-295). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Estrada, C. (1999). The role of subjective essentialism on group decision making. Unpublished raw data, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Rocher, S. (in press). Subjective essentialism and the emergence of stereotypes. In C. McGarty, V. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), The formation of social stereotypes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S., McGarty, C., & Haslam, S. A. (1997). Illusory correlation: Naive theories and the formation of social stereotypes. Unpublished raw data, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & A. Haslam (Eds.), The psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20-50). London: Basil Blackwell.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Rogier, A. (in press). Blame it on the group: Entitativity, subjective essentialism and social attribution. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Fiske, S. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1090-1104.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. R. Kelly and J. R. Spoor
Naive Theories About the Effects of Mood in Groups: A Preliminary Investigation
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 203 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. Lickel, N. Miller, D. M. Stenstrom, T. F. Denson, and T. Schmader
Vicarious Retribution: The Role of Collective Blame in Intergroup Aggression
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 372 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
A. B. Cohen, D. E. Hall, H. G. Koenig, and K. G. Meador
Social Versus Individual Motivation: Implications for Normative Definitions of Religious Orientation
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 48 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yzerbyt, V.
Right arrow Articles by Estrada, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yzerbyt, V.
Right arrow Articles by Estrada, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?