Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 52-73 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_4

Subtyping and Subgrouping: Processes for the Prevention and Promotion of Stereotype Change

Zoeë Richards

Miles Hewstone

School of Psychology, Cardiff University

Two processes of stereotyping, subtyping and subgrouping, are compared. Subtyping occurs when perceivers respond to members of a target group who disconfirm their stereotypes by seeing them as exceptions to the rule and placing them in a separate subcategory apart from members who confirm the stereotype. The more recently defined process of subgrouping refers to the perceiver's organization of information in terms of clusters of individuals based on their similarities and differences; subgroups can include confirmers and disconfirmers. We consider how subtypes and subgroups are defined, operationalized, and measured, their consequences for stereotype change, and the role of typicality. It is concluded that the clearest difference between subtyping and subgrouping is in terms of their consequences (subtyping leads to the preservation and subgrouping to differentiation of the stereotype). There are, however, some similarities between the processes, and attention is drawn to whatfuture research is required, both to deepen our knowledge of each process and clarify their distinction.

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1954). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3, 343-352.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. (Original work published 1954)
  • Andersen, S. M., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 235-246.[CrossRef]
  • Ashmore, R. D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 37-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Baron, R. A. (1997). An ecological view of stereotype accuracy. In Y.-T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy. Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 115-140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Branco, K. J., & Williamson, J. B. (1982). Stereotyping and the life cycle: Views of aging and the aged. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 364-510). New York: Praeger.
  • Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
  • Brewer, M. B., Dull, V., & Lui, L. (1981). Perceptions of the elderly: Stereotypes as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 656-670.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Brewer, M. B., & Lui, L. (1984). Categorization of the elderly by the elderly: Effects of perceiver's category membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 585-595.[Abstract]
  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1988). Contact and cooperation: When do they work? In P. Katz & D. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Means and controversies (pp. 315-326.) New York: Plenum.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
  • Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought: Limits of awareness, intention and thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
  • Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Wick, B. (1976). Stereotypes of women: A single category? Sex Roles, 2, 135-148.
  • Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 788-827). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Deaux, K., Winton, W., Crowley, M., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Level of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145-167.
  • Devine, P. G., & Baker, S. M. (1991). Measurement of racial stereotype subtyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 44-50.[Abstract]
  • Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139-1150.[Abstract]
  • Duckitt, J. (1992). Psychology and prejudice: A historical analysis and integrative framework. American Psychologist, 47, 1182-1193.[CrossRef]
  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolutions of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-735.
  • Eckes, T. (1994). Features of men, features of women: Assessing stereotypic beliefs about gender subtypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 107-123.
  • Eckes, T. (1996). Linking female and male subtypes to situations: A range-of-situation-fit effect. Sex Roles, 35, 401-426.[CrossRef]
  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Goethals, G. R., Allison, S. J., & Frost, M. (1979). Perceptions of the magnitude and diversity of social support. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 15, 570-581.[CrossRef]
  • Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Preferring "housewives" to "feminists": Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25-52.[CrossRef]
  • Hamilton, D. L. (1979). A cognitive-attributional analysis of stereotyping. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 53-84). New York: Academic.
  • Hamilton, D. L. (1981). Stereotyping and intergroup behavior: Some thought on the cognitive approach. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 333-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Mackie, D. M. (1990). Specificity and generality in the nature and use of stereotypes. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 99-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Hamilton, D. L., & Trolier, T. K. (1986). Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 127-163). Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Hantzi, A. (1995). Change in stereotypic perceptions of familiar and unfamiliar groups: The pervasiveness of the subtyping model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 463-477.
  • Hense, R. L., Penner, L. A., & Nelson, D. L. (1995). Implicit memory for age stereotypes. Social Cognition, 13, 399-415.
  • Hewstone, M. (1989). Changing stereotypes with disconfirming evidence. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 207-223). New York and London: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hewstone, M. (1994). Revision and change of stereotypic beliefs: In search of the elusive subtyping model. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 69-109). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Hewstone, M. (1996). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 323-368). New York: Guilford.
  • Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis.’ In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Hewstone, M., Crisp, R., Voci, A., Richards, Z., & Rubin, M. (2000). Perceived group variability and group favouritism: Effects of gender and majority-minority context. Manuscript submitted for publication, Cardiff University, UK.
  • Hewstone, M., & Hamberger, J. (in press). Perceived variability and stereotype change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 103-124.
  • Hewstone, M., Hassebrauck, M., Wirth, A., & Waenke, M. (in press). Pattern of disconfirming information and processing instructions as determinants of stereotype change. British Journal of Social Psychology.
  • Hewstone, M., Johnston, L., & Aird, P. (1992). Cognitive models of stereotype change: (2) Perceptions of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 235-250.
  • Hewstone, M., Macrae, C. N., Griffiths, R., Milne, A., & Brown, R. (1994). Cognitive models of stereotype change: (5) Measurement, development, and consequences of subtyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 505-526.[CrossRef]
  • Holland, D., & Skinner, D. (1987). Prestige and intimacy: The cultural models behind Americans' talk about gender types. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.78-111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Huddy, L., & Virtanen, S. (1995). Subgroup differentiation and subgroup bias among Latinos as a function of familiarity and positive distinctiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 97-108.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hummert, M. L. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: A comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5, 182-193.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., Shaner, J. L., & Strahm, S. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 49, 240-249.
  • Hummert, M. L., Garstka, T. A., Shaner, J. L., & Strahm, S. (1995). Judgements about stereotypes of the elderly. Research on Aging, 17, 168-189.[Abstract]
  • Johnston, L., & Hewstone, M. (1992). Cognitive models of stereotype change: (3) Subtyping and the perceived typicality of disconfirming group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 360-386.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Johnston, L., Hewstone, M., Pendry, L., & Frankish, C. (1994). Cognitive models of stereotype change: (4) Motivational and cognitive influences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 237-266.
  • Jones, E. E., Wood, G. C., & Quattrone, G. A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics in in-groups and out-groups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 523-528.[Abstract]
  • Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1988). Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 778-788.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109-128.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Judd, C. M., Park, B., Ryan, C. S., Brauer, M., & Kraus, S. (1995). Stereotypes and ethnocentrism: Diverging interethnic perceptions of African American and white American youth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 460-481.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Judd, C. M., Ryan, C. S., & Park, B. (1991). Accuracy in the judgements of in-group and out-group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 469-480.
  • Kirschenman, J., & Neckerman, K. M. (1991). "We'd love to hire them but...." The meaning of race for employers. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 203-232). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
  • Kraus, S., Ryan, C. S., Judd, C. M., Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1993). Use of mental frequency distributions to represent variability information in social categories. Social Cognition, 11, 22-43.
  • Krueger, J. (1996). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 536-548.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Krueger, J., & Rothbart, M. (1988). Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 187-195.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kunda, Z., & Oleson, K. C. (1995). Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 565-579.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lambert, A. J., Barton, L. R., Lickel, B., & Wells; J. (1998). The influence of group variability and processing goals on the ease of making judgments about social categories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 807-820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflict. New York: Harper.
  • Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
  • Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Salovey, P. (1989). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer stimulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Yoon, C. (1996). Perceived covariation among the features of in-group and out-group members: The out-group covariation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 421-436.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Linville, P W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Linville, P. W., Salovey, P., & Fischer, G. W. (1986). Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to in-group/out-group perception. In J. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 165-208). New York: Academic.
  • Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Maurer, K. L., Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1995). Subtyping versus subgrouping processes in stereotype representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 812-824.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup relations. In M. R. Rosenweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review ofpsychology (Vol. 40, pp. 45-81). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • Moreno, K. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1999). Resisting stereotype change: The role of motivation and attentional capacity in defending social beliefs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 5-16.
  • Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of in-group and out-group variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.[CrossRef]
  • Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Noseworthy, C. M., & Lott, A. J. (1984). The cognitive organization of gender-stereotypic categories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 474-481.[Abstract]
  • Ostrom, T. M., Carpenter, S. L., & Sedikides, C. (1993). Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 21-34.
  • Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59,173-191.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Ryan, C. S. (1991). Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 211-246). Chichester, England: Wiley.
  • Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Park, B., Ryan, C. S., & Judd, C. M. (1992). Role of meaningful subgroups in explaining differences in perceived variability for in-groups and out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 553-567.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Park, B., Wolsko, C., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Measurement of subtyping in stereotype change. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
  • Pendry, L. F., & Macrae, C. N. (1999). Cognitive load and person memory: The role of perceived group variability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 925-942.[CrossRef]
  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1981). Extending the stereotype concept. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 303-331). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Ramsey, S. L., Lord, G. L., Wallace, D. S., & Pugh, M. A. (1994). The role of subtypes in attitudes towards superordinate social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 38-71.
  • Richards, Z. (2000). Exemplar types and perceived variability: Context, cognitive process and consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University, UK.
  • Richards, Z., & Hewstone, M. (1999). Individual differences in subgrouping. Manuscript in preparation, Cardiff University, UK.
  • Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Rothbart, M., & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioural episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104.
  • Rothbart, M., & Lewis, S. (1988). Inferring category attributes from exemplar attributes: Geometric shapes and social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 861-872.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ryan, C. S., & Bogart, L. M. (1997). Development of new group members' in-group and out-group stereotypes: Changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 719-732.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ryan, C. S., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1996). Assessing stereotype accuracy: Implications for understanding the stereotype process. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 121-157). New York: Guilford.
  • Six, E. R., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57-71.[CrossRef]
  • Smedly, J. W., & Bayton, J. A. (1978). Evaluative race-class stereotypes by race and perceived class of subjects. Journal of Personalitv and Social Psychology, 36, 530-535.[CrossRef]
  • Smith, E. R. (1990). Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 1-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Srull, T. K., Lichtenstein, M., & Rothbart, M. (1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 316-345.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glass, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 207-218.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Synder, M., & Miene, P. K. (1994). Stereotyping of the elderly: A functional approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 63-82.
  • Tausch, N., & Hewstone, M. (2000). Subtyping and stereotyping of group members: A multiple measures analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Universitdt Halle, Germany, and Cardiff University, UK.
  • Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 83-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Vescio, T., Hewstone, M., Richards, Z., Paolini, S., & Willis, H. (2000). Subgroups and individuals: Their effect on perceived variability. Manuscript in preparation, Cardiff University, UK.
  • Vonk, R., & Olde-Monnikhof, M. (1998). Gender subgroups: Intergroup bias within the sexes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 37-47.
  • Wallace, D. S., Lord, C. G., & Ramsey, S. L. (1995). Relationship between self-typicality and the in-group subtypes effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 581-587.[Abstract]
  • Weber, R., & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 961-977.[CrossRef][ISI]
  • Weber-Kollmann, R. (1985). Subtyping: The development and consequences of differentiated categoriesfor stereotyped groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  • Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wilder, D. A. (1984). Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 323-333.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Yzerbyt, V., Coull, A., & Rocher, S. (in press). Fencing off the deviant: The role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Communication ResearchHome page
J. J. Covert and T. L. Dixon
A Changing View: Representation and Effects of the Portrayal of Women of Color in Mainstream Women's Magazines
Communication Research, April 1, 2008; 35(2): 232 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 364 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Harwood, M. Hewstone, S. Paolini, and A. Voci
Grandparent-Grandchild Contact and Attitudes Toward Older Adults: Moderator and Mediator Effects
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 393 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
S. Queller
Stereotype Change in a Recurrent Network
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2002; 6(4): 295 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hewstone, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?