|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, No. 2,
86-107 (1999)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1
Judgments of Deservingness: Studies in the Psychology of Justice and Achievement
N. T. Feather
School of Psychology The Flinders University of South Australia
This article presents a review and conceptual analysis of the concept of deservingness that incorporates the effects of personal values, perceived responsibility, ingroup-outgroup relations, and like-dislike relations. Selected studies show that reactions to another's success or failure and to the rise or fall of "tall poppies" or high achievers depends on the degree to which the positive or negative outcome is seen to be deserved; that individual differences in personal values and in value syndromes may be assumed to affect deservingness via the subjective values assigned to actions and outcomes; that group membership, status, interpersonal liking-disliking, and perceived moral character also affect judgments of deservingness; and that deservingness is a key variable that mediates how observers react to penalties imposed on the perpetrators of different kinds of offense. It is argued that the inclusion of deservingness goes beyond approaches in which perceived responsibility is accorded central status by adding a further link in the causal chain, thus enabling a more complete consideration of the effects of justice and value variables on how people react to positive and negative outcomes for both self and other.
References
- Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
- Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.[CrossRef]
- Brendl, C. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95–160). Orlando, FL: Academic.
- Brewer, M. B. (1977). An information-processing approach to attribution of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 58–69.[CrossRef]
- Brewer, M. B. (1993). The role of distinctiveness in social identity and group behavior. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.). Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 1–16). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol.2, pp. 554–594). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
- Cartwright, D., & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63, 277–293.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egotistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 13, 85–113.
- Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaikin, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 1 (pp. 269–322). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Fairchild, H. H., & Cowan, G. (1997). The O. J. Simpson trial: Challenges to science and society. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 583–591.[CrossRef]
- Feather, N. T. (1971). Organization and discrepancy in cognitive structures. Psychological Review, 78, 355–379.[CrossRef]
- Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.
- Feather, N. T. (1982a). Actions in relation to expected consequences: An overview of a research program. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp.53–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Feather, N. T. (Ed.). (1982b). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Feather, N. T. (1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 239–267.
- Feather, N. T. (1990a). Bridging the gap between values and actions. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol.2, pp. 151–192). New York: Guilford.
- Feather, N. T. (1990b). The psychological impact of unemployment. New York: Springer- Verlag.
- Feather, N. T. (1990c). Reactions to equal reward allocations: Effects of situation, gender and values. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 315–329.
- Feather, N. T. (1992a). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 125–145.
- Feather, N. T. (1992b). Values, valences, expectations, and actions. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 109–124.
- Feather, N. T. (1993). The rise and fall of political leade
 s: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 61–68. - Feather, N. T. (1994a). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1–73). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Feather, N. T. (1994b). Human values and their relation to justice. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 129–151.
- Feather, N. T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135–1151.[CrossRef]
- Feather, N. T. (1996a). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 507–519.[CrossRef]
- Feather, N. T. (1996b). Extending the search for order in social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 221–227.
- Feather, N. T. (1996c). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Feather, N. T. (1996d). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium Volume 8 (pp. 215–251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528–544.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Feather, N. T. (in press). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
- Feather, N. T., & Atchinson, L. (1998). Reactions to an offense in relation to status of offender and offender's controllability of status. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 119–127.
- Feather, N. T., & Dawson, S. (1998). Reactions to another's employment or unemployment in relation to Protestant ethic values, responsibility, valued actions, liking relations, and deservingness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 361–381.[CrossRef]
- Feather, N. T., & Deverson, N. A. (in press). Reactions to a motor vehicle accident in relation to mitigating circumstances and the gender and moral worth of the driver. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
- Feather, N. T., Norman, M. A., & Worsley, A. (1998). Values and valences: Variables relating to the attractiveness and choice of food in different contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 639–656.[CrossRef]
- Feather, N. T., & Oberdan, D. (in press). Reactions to penalties for an offence in relation to ethnic identity, responsibility, and authoritarianism. Australian Journal of Psychology.
- Feather, N. T., Volkmer, R. E., & McKee, I. R. (1991). Attitudes to high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 85–91.
- Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Fincham, F. D., & Jaspars, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: From man the scientist to man as lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 81–138). New York: Academic.
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1973). Attribution of responsibility: A theoretical note. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 148–153.[CrossRef]
- Folger, R. (Ed.). (1984). The sense of injustice: social psychological perspectives. New York: Plenum.
- Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical and policy perspectives (pp. 183–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Inc.
- French, J. R. P., & Kahn, R. L. (1962). A programmatic approach to studying the industrial environment and mental health. Journal of Social Issues, 18(3), 1–47.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Graham, S., Weiner, B., & Zucker, G. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 331–346.[Abstract]
- Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316–328.[CrossRef]
- Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday justice: Responsibility and the individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Hart. H. L. A., & Honoré, A. M. (1959). Causation in the law. London: Oxford University Press.
- Heath, A. (1976). Rational choice and social exchange. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.[CrossRef]
- Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
- Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48–70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Ho, R., & Venus, M. (1995). Reactions to a battered woman who kills her abused spouse: An attributional analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 153–159.
- Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group process. London: Routledge.
- Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.[Abstract]
- Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.[CrossRef]
- Lerner, J. S., Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563–574.[Abstract]
- Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
- Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and the fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107–121.[CrossRef]
- Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in a just world: Some thoughts on why and how people care about justice. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Reponses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 247–269). New York: Plenum.
- Lerner, M. J., & Mikula, G. (1994). Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships. New York: Plenum.
- Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.
- Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
- Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1994). Value-attitude-behavior relations: The moderating effect of attitude functions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 301–312.[ISI]
- Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Marques, J. M. (1990). The black sheep effect: Out-group homogeneity in social comparison settings. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 131–151). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
- Mikula, G. (1993). On the experience of injustice. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 223–244.
- Miller, D. T., & Vidmar, N. (1981). The social psychology of punishment reactions. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp.145–172). New York: Plenum.
- Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Expectancy-value models in organizational psychology. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 293–312). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Parkinson, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1992). Appraisal as a cause of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Pepitone, A., & L'Armand, K. (1996). The justice and injustice of life events. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 581–597.[CrossRef]
- Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Dissonance and balance in belief systems: The promise of parallel constraint satisfaction processes and connectionist modeling approaches. In R. C. Schank & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson (pp. 209–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rector, N. A., & Bagby, R. M. (1997). Minority juridic decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 69–81.
- Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame. Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
- Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Rotter, J. B. (1982). Social learning theory. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 241–260). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632–652.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium, Volume 8 (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Schwarz, N. (1990). Feeling as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol.2, pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford.
- Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned to an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Shultz, T. R., & Darley, J. M. (1991). An information processing model of retributive justice based on "legal reasoning". In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Vol.2. Research (pp. 247–278). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Shultz, T. R., & Schleifer, M. (1983). Towards a refinement of attribution concepts. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions (pp. 37–62). London: Academic.
- Shultz, T. R., Schleifer, M., & Altman, I. (1981). Judgments of causation, responsibility, and punishment in cases of wrong-doing. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13, 238–253.
- Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (Eds.). (1989). Oxford English Dictionary, Vol. 4 (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
- Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491–522.[CrossRef]
- Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1205–1223.[CrossRef]
- Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W. (1956). Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.
- Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and entitlement in marriage: Benefits and barriers. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 229–258). New York: Plenum.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
- Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
- von Hirsch, A. (1986). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
- Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
- Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
- Weiner, B. (1996). Searching for order in social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 7, 199–216.[CrossRef]
- Zajonc, R. B. (1960). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.[CrossRef]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
H. Joffe and C. Staerkle
The Centrality of the Self-Control Ethos in Western Aspersions Regarding Outgroups: A Social Representational Approach to Stereotype Content
Culture Psychology,
December 1, 2007;
13(4):
395 - 418.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Vandello, N. P. Goldschmied, and D. A. R. Richards
The Appeal of the Underdog
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2007;
33(12):
1603 - 1616.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Falomir-Pichastor, C. Staerkle, M.-A. Depuiset, and F. Butera
Perceived Legitimacy of Collective Punishment as a Function of Democratic versus Non-Democratic Group Structure
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2007;
10(4):
565 - 579.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
