|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 10, No. 4,
282-294 (2006)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_1
Componential Analysis of Interpersonal Perception Data
David A. Kenny
Tessa V. West
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut
Thomas E. Malloy
Department of Psychology, Rhode Island College
Linda Albright
Department of Psychology, Westfield State College
We examine the advantages and disadvantages of 2 types of analyses used in interpersonal perception studies: componential and noncomponential. Componential analysis of interpersonal perception data (Kenny, 1994) partitions a judgment into components and then estimates the variances of and the correlations between these components. A noncomponential analysis uses raw scores to analyze interpersonal perception data. Three different research areas are investigated: consensus of perceptions across social contexts, reciprocity of attraction, and individual differences in self-enhancement. Finally, we consider criticisms of componential analysis. We conclude that interpersonal perception data necessarily have components (e.g., perceiver, target, measure, and their interactions), and that the researcher needs to develop a model that best captures the researcher's questions.
References
- Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
- Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others"and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Curry, T. J., & Emerson, R. M. (1970). Balance theory: A theory of interpersonal attraction? Sociometry, 33, 216-238.[CrossRef]
- Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582.[CrossRef]
- Desoto, C. B.,& Kuethe, J. (1959). Subjective probabilities of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 290-294.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.[CrossRef]
- Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Funder, D. C. (2001). Three trends in current research on person perception: Positivity, realism, and sophistication. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 319-331). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 656-672.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 379-398.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430-439.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Israel, J. (1958). A note in measurement of cross-pressures in groups. Acta Psychologica, 14, 353-358.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- John, O. P. (1990). The "big five" factor taxonomy of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin, (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
- Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109-128.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jussim, L. (2005). Accuracy in social perception: Criticisms, controversies, criteria, components, and cognitive processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 1-93). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
- Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
- Kenny, D. A., & Albright, L. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390-402.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the big five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245-258.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kenny, D. A., Bond, C. F., Jr., Mohr, C. D., & Horn, E. M. (1996). Do we know how much people like one another? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71, 928-936.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-348.
- Kenny, D. A., & Nasby, W. (1980). Splitting the reciprocity correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 249-256.[CrossRef]
- Kenny, D. A., & Winquist, L. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultiral explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kwan, V. S. Y., John, O. P., & Kenny, D. A., Bond, M. H., & Robins, R. W. (2004). Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 111, 94-110.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181.
- Malloy, T. E., Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Interpersonal perception and metaperception in non-overlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 390-398.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Norman, W. T. (1967). On estimating psychological relationships: Social desirability and self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 273-293.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, N. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Sherman, S. J., & Wolosin, R. J. (1973). Cognitive biases in a recognition task. Journal of Personality, 41, 395-412.[CrossRef]
- Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Use in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.[CrossRef][ISI]
- Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
- Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zajonc, R. B., & Burnstein, E. (1965). Structural balance, reciprocity, and positivity as sources of cognitive bias. Journal of Personality, 33, 570-583.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
|