Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Review
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geyer, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geyer, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Nonconformist Account of the Asch Experiments: Values, Pragmatics, and Moral Dilemmas

Bert H. Hodges

Department of Psychology, Gordon College

Anne L. Geyer

Department of Psychology, Florida State University

This article offers a new approach to Asch's (1956) influential studies relating physical and social perception. Drawing on research on values, conversational pragmatics, cross-cultural comparisons, and negotiation, the authors challenge the normative assumptions that have led psychologists to interpret the studies in terms of conformity. A values-pragmatics account is offered that suggests that participants attempt to realize multiple values (e.g., truth, social solidarity) in an inherently frustrating situation by tacitly varying patterns of dissent and agreement to communicate larger scale truths and cooperative intentions. Alternative theories (e.g., embarrassment, attribution) are compared and empirical implications of the values-pragmatics account are evaluated. The possibility of multiple strategies promoting group survival and the proper role of moral evaluation in social psychological research are considered.

References

  • Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity, and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Allen, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 133-175). New York: Academic.
  • Allen, V. L. (1975). Social support for nonconformity. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1-43). New York: Academic.
  • Allen, V. L., & Newtson, D. (1972). Development of conformity and independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 18-30.[CrossRef]
  • Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1977). Social comparison, self-evaluation, and conformity to the group. In M. J. Suls & L. R. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes and theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 187-208). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
  • Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Asch, S. E. (1955, November). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31-35.[Web of Science]
  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and submission to group pressure: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9, Whole No. 417).
  • Asch, S. E. (1961). Issues in the study of social influences on judgment. In I. A. Berg & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Conformity and deviation (pp. 143-158). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Asch, S. E. (1990). Comments on D. T. Campbell's chapter. In I. Rock (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 53-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979)
  • Balance, W. G. (1968). Acquiescence: Acquiescent response style, social conformity, authoritarianism, and visual field dependency (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, 1967). Dissertation Abstracts, 28B, 1165.
  • Baron, S. R., Vandello, A. J., & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 915-927.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Barron, F. (1962). Some personality correlates of independence of judgment. Journal of Personality, 21, 287-297.[CrossRef]
  • Batson, C. D. (1995). Prosocial motivation: Why do we help others? In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 333-381). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., & Chen, H. (2002). Moral hypocrisy: Addressing some alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 330-339.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3-26.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Baumeister, R. F. (1997). Evil: Inside human violence and cruelty. New York: Freeman.
  • Bloom, A. (1984). Caution—The words you use may effect what you say: A response to Au. Cognition, 17, 281-281.
  • Bond, M. H. (1990). Beyond the Chineseface. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organizations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bowler, D. M., & Worley, K. (1994). Susceptibility to social influence in adults with Asperger's syndrome: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 689-697.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Bowles, S. (2001). Individual interactions, group conflicts, and the evolution of preferences. In S. N. Durlauf & P. H. Young (Eds.), Social dynamics: Economic learning and social evolution (pp. 155-190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1961). Conformity in psychology's theories of acquired behavioral dispositions. In I. A. Berg & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Conformity and deviation (pp. 101-142). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Campbell, D. T. (1990). Asch's moral epistemology for socially shared knowledge. In I. Rock (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 39-52). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Caporael, L. R., & Baron, R. M. (1997). Groups as the mind's natural environment. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 317-344). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Caporael, L. R., Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., & van de Kragt, A. J. C. (1989). Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 683-739.
  • Ceraso, J., Gruber, H., & Rock, I. (1990). On Solomon Asch. In I. Rock (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 3-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Chandra, S. (1973). The effects of group pressure in perception: A cross-cultural conformity study in Fiji. International Journal of Psychology, 8, 37-39.
  • Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481-494.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 179-231). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Cohen, B. P. (1958). A probability model for conformity. Sociometry, 21, 69-81.[CrossRef]
  • Crittenden, P. M., & DiLalla, D. L. (1988). Compulsive compliance: The development of an inhibitory coping strategy in infancy. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 7, 231-244.
  • Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10, 191-198.[CrossRef]
  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.[CrossRef]
  • Dittes, J. E., & Kelley, H. H. (1956). Effect of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 53, 100-107.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Doms, M., & Van Avermaet, E. (1981). The conformity effect: A timeless phenomenon? A reply to Perrin & Spencer. Bulletin of the British Psychology Society, 34, 383-385.
  • Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-696.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Feinman, S. (1992). Social referencing and conformity. In S. Feinman (Ed.), Social referencing and the social construction of reality in infancy (pp. 229-267). New York: Plenum.
  • Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92-99.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Frager, R. (1970). Conformity and anti-conformity in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 203-210.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Friend, R., Rafferty, Y., & Bramel, D. (1990). A puzzling misinterpretation of the Asch ‘conformity’ study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 29-44.
  • Furnham, A. (1984). Studies of cross-cultural conformity: A brief and critical review. Psychologia, 27(1), 65-72.
  • Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.
  • Gerard, H. B., Wilhelmy, R. A., & Conolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79-82.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.[CrossRef]
  • Gilovich, T., & Eibach, R. (2001). The fundamental attribution error where it really counts. Psychological Inquiry, 12(1), 23-26.
  • Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Gleitman, H., Rozin, P., & Sabini, J. (1997). Solomon E. Asch, American Psychologist, 52, 984-985.[CrossRef]
  • Gould, L. J. (1969). Conformity and marginality: Two faces of alienation. Journal of Social Issues, 25(2), 39-63.
  • Graham, D. (1962). Experimental studies of social influence in simple judgment situations. Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 245-269.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic.
  • Grice, H. P. (1991). The conception of value. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
  • Harris, R. P. (1985). Asch's data and the ‘Asch effect’: A critical note. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 229-230.
  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Hodges, B. H. (2004). Asch and the balance of values. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 343-344.[CrossRef]
  • Hodges, B. H., & Baron, R. M. (1992). Values as constraints on affordances: Perceiving and acting properly. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22, 263-294.
  • Hollander, E. P., & Willis, R. H. (1967). Some current issues in the psychology of conformity and nonconformity. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 62-76.[CrossRef]
  • Insko, C. A., Smith, R. H., Alicke, M. D., Wade, J., & Taylor, S. (1985). Conformity and group size: The concern with being right and the concern with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 41-50.[Abstract]
  • Israel, J. (1963). Experimental change of attitude using the Asch-effect. Acta Sociology, 7, 95-104.
  • Jackson, J. M., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1958). The effect of person-group relationships on conformity pressures. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 57, 17-24.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelly, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
  • Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3-28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785-800.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 313-327.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Kuczynski, L., & Hildebrandt, N. (1997). Models of conformity and resistance in socialization theory. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children's internalization of values (pp. 227-256). New York: Wiley.
  • Kurosawa, K. (1993). Self-monitoring and conformity revisited: A case for a four-factor measurement model. Japanese Psychological Record, 35(1), 19-31.
  • Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 183-228). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
  • Lalancette, M.-F., & Standing, L. (1990). Asch fails again. Social Behavior and Personality, 18, 7-12.[CrossRef]
  • Lamb, T. A., & Alsikafi, M. (1980). Conformity in the Asch experiment: Inner-other directedness and the "defiant subject." Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 13-16.[CrossRef]
  • Larsen, K. S. (1990). The Asch conformity experiment: Replication and transhistorical comparisons. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 163-168.
  • Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lau, S. (1992). Collectivism's individualism: Value preference, personal control, and the desire for freedom among Chinese in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Singapore. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 361-366.[CrossRef]
  • Levine, J. M. (1999). Solomon Asch's legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 358-364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leyens, J.-P., & Corneille, O. (1999). Asch's social psychology: Not as social as you may think. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 345-357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Linde, T. F., & Patterson, C. H. (1964). Influence of orthopedic disability on conformity behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 115-118.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Loevinger, J. (1993). Conformity and conscientiousness: One factor or two stages? In D. Funder (Ed.), Studying lives through time (pp. 189-205). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1961). Group cohesiveness, communication level, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 62, 408-412.
  • MacDonald, G., Nail, P. R., & Levy, D. A. (2004). Expanding the scope of the social response context model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 77-92.[CrossRef]
  • Martin, J. E., Kleindorfer, G. B., & Brashers, W. R. (1987). The theory of bounded rationality and the problem of legitimation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17, 63-82.
  • Martin, R. (1995). Majority and minority influence using the afterimage paradigm: A replication with an unambiguous blue slide. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 373-381.
  • Matas, L., Arend, R., & Sroufe, L. O. (1978). Continuity of adaptation in the second year: The relationship between quality of attachment and later competence. Child Development, 49, 547-556.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Matsuda, N. (1985). Strong, quasi-, and weak conformity among Japanese in the modified Asch procedure. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(1), 83-97.[Abstract]
  • McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (2003). Solomon Asch: Scientist and humanist. In G. A. Kimble & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 249-261). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • McKelvey, W., & Kerr, N. H. (1988). Differences in conformity among friends and strangers. Psychological Reports, 62, 759-762.
  • Merton, R. (1968). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Messick, D. M., & Ohme, R. K. (1998). Some ethical aspects of the social psychology of social influence. In R. M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 181-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Midgley, M. (1993). Can't we make moral judgments? New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Milgram, S. (1961, December). Nationality and conformity. Scientific American, 205, 45-51.
  • Milgram, S. (1964). Group pressure and action against a person. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 137-143.[CrossRef]
  • Miller, S. A., & Kanazawa, S. (2000). Order by accident: The origins and consequences of conformity in contemporary Japan. Denver, CO: Westview.
  • Moeller, G., & Applezweig, M. H. (1957). A motivational factor in conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 14-20.
  • Morris, W. N., & Miller, R. S. (1975). The effects of consensus-breaking and consensus-preempting partners on reduction of conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 215-223.[CrossRef]
  • Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic.
  • Moscovici, S. (1985a). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. V. Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-51). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moscovici, S. (1985b). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
  • Moscovici, S., & Lage, E. (1978). Studies in social influence: IV. Minority influence in a context of original judgments. European Journal of Social Pxychology, 8, 349-365.
  • Mugny, G. (1985). Direct and indirect influence in the Asch paradigm: Effects of ‘valid’ or ‘denied’ information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 457-461.
  • Nail, P. R. (1986). Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 190-206.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Nail, P. R., MacDonald, G., & Levy, D. A. (2000). Proposal of a four-dimensional model of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 454-470.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Nemeth, C. (1985). Compromising public influence for private change. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 75-90). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Neto, F. (1995). Conformity and independence revisited. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 217-222.[CrossRef]
  • Newtson, D., & Czerlinsky, T. (1974). Adjustments of attitude communications for contrasts by extreme audiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 829-837.[CrossRef]
  • Nicholson, N., Cole, G. S., & Rocklin, T. (1985). Conformity in the Asch situation: A comparison between contemporary British and US university students. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 59-63.
  • Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Americans think differently and why. New York: Free Press.
  • Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York: Guilford.
  • Perrin, S., & Spencer, C. (1981). Independence or conformity in the Asch experiment as a reflection of cultural and situational factors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 205-209.[Web of Science]
  • Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
  • Ross, L., Bierbrauer, G., & Hoffman, S. (1976). The role of attribution processes in conformity and dissent: Revisiting the Asch situation. American Psychologist, 31, 148-157.[CrossRef]
  • Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 564-596). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Sabini, J., Cosmas, K., Siepmann, M., & Stein, J. (2000). False consensus effects in estimates of embarrassment and other emotions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 223-241.[CrossRef]
  • Sabini, J., Garvey, B., & Hall, A. L. (2001). Shame and embarrassment revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 104-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Sabini, J., Siepmann, M., & Stein, J. (2001a). Authors' responses to commentaries. Psychological Inquiry, 12(1), 41-48.
  • Sabini, J., Siepmann, M., & Stein, J. (2001b). The really fundamental attribution error in social psychological research. Psychological Inquiry, 12,(1) 1-15.
  • Sakurai, M. M. (1975). Small group cohesiveness and detrimental conformity. Sociometry, 38, 340-357.[CrossRef]
  • Santee, R. T., & Maslach, C. (1982). To agree or not to agree: Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 69-700.
  • Schulman, G. I. (1967). Asch conformity studies: Conformity to the experimenter and/or to the group? Sociometry, 30, 26-40.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, C. H. Triandis, G. Kagitgibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schwarz, N. (1996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, 27, No. 187.
  • Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1999). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Snyder, M. & Monson, T. C. (1975). Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 637-644.[CrossRef]
  • Sober, E., & Wilson. D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Su, S. K., Chiu, C., Hong, Y., Leung, K., Peng, K., & Morris, M. W. (1999). Self-organization and social organization: U. S. and Chinese constructions. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.). The psychology of the social self: Applied social research (pp. 193-222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
  • Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Tesser, A., Campbell, J., & Mickler, S. (1983). The role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self-doubt in conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 217-233.
  • Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109, 451-471.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1-86.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social conformity. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Van Avermaet, E. (2001). Social influence in small groups. In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 403-443). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
  • Van Lange, P. A. M., & DeDreu, C. K. W. (2001). Social interaction: Cooperation and competition. In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Introduction to social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 341-369). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
  • Walker, M. B., & Andrade, M. G. (1996). Conformity in the Asch task as function of age. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 367-372.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Waller, J. (2002). Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Whittaker, J. O., & Meade, R. D. (1967). Social pressure in the modification and distortion of judgment: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Psychology, 2, 109-113.
  • Wiesenthal, D. L., Edwards, J., Endler, N. S., Koza, P., Walton, A., & Emmott, S. (1978). Trends in conformity research. Canadian Psychological Review, 19, 41-58.
  • Williams, T. P., & Sogon, S. (1984). Group composition and conforming behavior in Japanese students. Japanese Psychological Research, 26, 231-234.
  • Willis, R. H. (1965). Conformity, independence, and anticonformity. Human Relations, 18, 373-388.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wilson, R. S. (1960). Personality patterns, source attractiveness, and conformity. Journal of Personality, 28, 186-199.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wood, W. (1999). Motives and modes of processing in the social influence of groups. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 547-570). New York: Guilford.
  • Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Yin, J. (2002). Telling the truth? A cultural comparison of "facilitating discussion" in American talk. Discourse Processes, 33, 235-256.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2-19 (2006)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_1
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. J. Packer
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 50 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
T. M. Holtgraves and Y. Kashima
Language, Meaning, and Social Cognition
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 73 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geyer, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Geyer, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?