This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Park, B. Articles by Judd, C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Park, B. Articles by Judd, C. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective

Charles M. Judd

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado

For the past 40 years, social psychological research on stereotyping and prejudice in the United States has been dominated by the social cognition perspective, which has emphasized the important role of basic categorization processes in intergroup dynamics. An inadvertent consequence of this approach has been a disproportionate focus on social categorization as a causal factor in intergroup animosity and, accordingly, an emphasis on approaches that minimize category distinctions as the solution to intergroup conflict. Though recognizing the crucial function of categorization, we question existing support for the hypothesis that the perception of strong group differences necessarily results in greater intergroup bias. Given that it is neither feasible nor ultimately desirable to imagine that social categories can be eliminated, we suggest that a more useful approach is one that promotes intergroup harmony even while recognizing and valuing the distinctions that define our social world.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 108-130 (2005)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. S. Paik, B. L. MacDougall, L. R. Fabrigar, J. M. Peach, and K. Jellous Altering Category-Level Beliefs: The Impact of Level of Representation at Belief Formation and Belief Disconfirmation Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2009; 35(8): 1112 - 1125. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. M. Rospenda, J. A. Richman, and C. A. Shannon Prevalence and Mental Health Correlates of Harassment and Discrimination in the Workplace: Results From a National Study J Interpers Violence, May 1, 2009; 24(5): 819 - 843. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Deffenbacher, B. Park, C. M. Judd, and J. Correll Category Boundaries Can Be Accentuated Without Increasing Intergroup Bias Group Processes Intergroup Relations, March 1, 2009; 12(2): 175 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. J. Van Bavel and W. A. Cunningham Self-Categorization With a Novel Mixed-Race Group Moderates Automatic Social and Racial Biases Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 321 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Correll, B. Park, and J. Allegra Smith Colorblind and Multicultural Prejudice Reduction Strategies in High-Conflict Situations Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 471 - 491. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Zogmaister, L. Arcuri, L. Castelli, and E. R. Smith The Impact of Loyalty and Equality on Implicit Ingroup Favoritism Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 493 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. S. Ryan, J. S. Hunt, J. A. Weible, C. R. Peterson, and J. F. Casas Multicultural and Colorblind Ideology, Stereotypes, and Ethnocentrism among Black and White Americans Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 617 - 637. [Abstract] [PDF]