Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Messick, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Messick, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

A Conceptual Review of Decision Making in Social Dilemmas: Applying a Logic of Appropriateness

J. Mark Weber

Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto

Shirli Kopelman

University of Michigan Business School

David M. Messick

Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

Despite decades of experimental social dilemma research, "theoretical integration has proven elusive" (Smithson & Foddy, 1999, p. 14). To advance a theory of decision making in social dilemmas, this article provides a conceptual review of the literature that applies a "logic of appropriateness" (March, 1994) framework. The appropriateness framework suggests that people making decisions ask themselves (explicitly or implicitly), "What does a person like me do in a situation like this?" This question identifies 3 significant factors: recognition and classification of the kind of situation encountered, the identity of the individual making the decision, and the application of rules or heuristics in guiding behavioral choice. In contrast with dominant rational choice models, the appropriateness framework proposed accommodates the inherently social nature of social dilemmas, and the role of rule and heuristic based processing. Implications for the interpretation of past findings and the direction of future research are discussed.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, 281-307 (2004)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_4


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
J. W. Jackson
Reactions to Social Dilemmas as a Function of Group Identity, Rational Calculations, and Social Context
Small Group Research, December 1, 2008; 39(6): 673 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. Halevy
Team Negotiation: Social, Epistemic, Economic, and Psychological Consequences of Subgroup Conflict
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2008; 34(12): 1687 - 1702.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. C. Leliveld, E. van Dijk, and I. van Beest
Initial Ownership in Bargaining: Introducing the Giving, Splitting, and Taking Ultimatum Bargaining Game
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2008; 34(9): 1214 - 1225.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. K. W. De Dreu, B. A. Nijstad, and D. van Knippenberg
Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 22 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
E. W. de Kwaadsteniet, E. van Dijk, A. Wit, D. De Cremer, and M. de Rooij
Justifying Decisions in Social Dilemmas: Justification Pressures and Tacit Coordination Under Environmental Uncertainty
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2007; 33(12): 1648 - 1660.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rationality and SocietyHome page
T. Yamagishi, S. Terai, T. Kiyonari, N. Mifune, and S. Kanazawa
The Social Exchange Heuristic: Managing Errors in Social Exchange
Rationality and Society, August 1, 2007; 19(3): 259 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization StudiesHome page
F. Wijen and S. Ansari
Overcoming Inaction through Collective Institutional Entrepreneurship: Insights from Regime Theory
Organization Studies, July 1, 2007; 28(7): 1079 - 1100.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
H. Gunz and S. Gunz
Hired professional to hired gun: An identity theory approach to understanding the ethical behaviour of professionals in non-professional organizations
Human Relations, June 1, 2007; 60(6): 851 - 887.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
N. Halevy, L. Sagiv, S. Roccas, and G. Bornstein
Perceiving Intergroup Conflict: From Game Models to Mental Templates
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1674 - 1689.
[Abstract] [PDF]