Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hornsey, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jetten, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hornsey, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jetten, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different

Matthew J. Hornsey

School of Psychology University of Queensland

Jolanda Jetten

School of Psychology University of Exeter

Many theorists have wrestled with the notion of how people balance their need to be included in social groups with their need to be different and distinctive. This question is particularly salient to researchers from the social identity perspective, who have traditionally viewed individual differentiation within groups as being inimical to group identification. In this article we present a number of strategies that people can use to balance their need to belong and their need to be different, without violating social identity principles. First, drawing from optimal distinctiveness theory, we discuss 4 ways in which the need for belonging and the need to be different can be resolved by maximizing group distinctiveness. We then discuss 4 ways in which it is possible to achieve individual differentiation within a group at the same time demonstrating group identification. These strategies are discussed and integrated with reference to recent empirical research and to the social identity perspective.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, 248-264 (2004)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J.-P. Leyens
Retrospective and Prospective Thoughts About Infrahumanization
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, November 1, 2009; 12(6): 807 - 817.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
D. Abrams
Social Identity on a National Scale: Optimal Distinctiveness and Young People's Self-Expression Through Musical Preference
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, May 1, 2009; 12(3): 303 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Imhoff and H.-P. Erb
What Motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness Seeking Blocks Majority Influence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 309 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 325 - 374.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
O. Janssen and Xu Huang
Us and Me: Team Identification and Individual Differentiation as Complementary Drivers of Team Members' Citizenship and Creative Behaviors
Journal of Management, February 1, 2008; 34(1): 69 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. J. Packer
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 50 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
D. T. Ory, P. L. Mokhtarian, and G. O. Collantes
Exploring the Cognitive and Affective Mechanisms Behind Subjective Assessments of Travel Amounts
Environment and Behavior, July 1, 2007; 39(4): 494 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
F. Rink and N. Ellemers
The Role of Expectancies in Accepting Task-Related Diversity: Do Disappointment and Lack of Commitment Stem From Actual Differences or Violated Expectations?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2007; 33(6): 842 - 854.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
K. W. Phillips, G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale
Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help?
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 467 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]