|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different
Matthew J. Hornsey
School of Psychology University of Queensland
Jolanda Jetten
School of Psychology University of Exeter
Many theorists have wrestled with the notion of how people balance their need to be included in social groups with their need to be different and distinctive. This question is particularly salient to researchers from the social identity perspective, who have traditionally viewed individual differentiation within groups as being inimical to group identification. In this article we present a number of strategies that people can use to balance their need to belong and their need to be different, without violating social identity principles. First, drawing from optimal distinctiveness theory, we discuss 4 ways in which the need for belonging and the need to be different can be resolved by maximizing group distinctiveness. We then discuss 4 ways in which it is possible to achieve individual differentiation within a group at the same time demonstrating group identification. These strategies are discussed and integrated with reference to recent empirical research and to the social identity perspective.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 3,
248-264 (2004)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Leyens
Retrospective and Prospective Thoughts About Infrahumanization
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
November 1, 2009;
12(6):
807 - 817.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Abrams
Social Identity on a National Scale: Optimal Distinctiveness and Young People's Self-Expression Through Musical Preference
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
May 1, 2009;
12(3):
303 - 317.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Imhoff and H.-P. Erb
What Motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness Seeking Blocks Majority Influence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2009;
35(3):
309 - 320.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Ashforth, S. H. Harrison, and K. G. Corley
Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamental Questions
Journal of Management,
June 1, 2008;
34(3):
325 - 374.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Janssen and Xu Huang
Us and Me: Team Identification and Individual Differentiation as Complementary Drivers of Team Members' Citizenship and Creative Behaviors
Journal of Management,
February 1, 2008;
34(1):
69 - 88.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Packer
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2008;
12(1):
50 - 72.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Ory, P. L. Mokhtarian, and G. O. Collantes
Exploring the Cognitive and Affective Mechanisms Behind Subjective Assessments of Travel Amounts
Environment and Behavior,
July 1, 2007;
39(4):
494 - 528.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Rink and N. Ellemers
The Role of Expectancies in Accepting Task-Related Diversity: Do Disappointment and Lack of Commitment Stem From Actual Differences or Violated Expectations?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
June 1, 2007;
33(6):
842 - 854.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Phillips, G. B. Northcraft, and M. A. Neale
Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help?
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
October 1, 2006;
9(4):
467 - 482.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|