Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bond, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bond, M. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 62-78 (2004)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0801_3

Culture and Aggression—From Context to Coercion

Michael Harris Bond

Department of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong

This article is an attempt to study the neglected linkages between culture and aggression. It does so by conceptualizing culture as a set of affordances and constraints that channel the expression of coercive means of social control by self and others. All cultural systems represent solutions to the problems associated with distributing desired material and social resources among its group members while maintaining social order and harmony. Norms are developed surrounding the exercise of mutual influence in the process of resource allocation, favoring some and marginalizing others. Violations of these norms by resource competitors are conceptualized as "aggressive" behaviors and stimulate a process of justified counterattack, escalating the violence. The current data from both societal-level and individual-level studies are examined and integrated in light of this organizing framework, and future studies are proposed to explore the interface between culture and aggression more productively.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
P. J. Fite, K. Stauffacher, J. M. Ostrov, and C. R. Colder
Replication and extension of Little et al.'s (2003) forms and functions of aggression measure
International Journal of Behavioral Development, May 1, 2008; 32(3): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
M. G. Harvey, M. R. Buckley, J. T. Heames, R. Zinko, R. L. Brouer, and G. R. Ferris
A Bully as an Archetypal Destructive Leader
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, November 1, 2007; 14(2): 117 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. Archer
Cross-Cultural Differences in Physical Aggression Between Partners: A Social-Role Analysis
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2006; 10(2): 133 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
M. G. Harvey, J. T. Heames, R. G. Richey, and N. Leonard
Bullying: From the Playground to the Boardroom
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2006; 12(4): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]