Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harris, C. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Domestic Violence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Reviews

A Review of Sex Differences in Sexual Jealousy, Including Self-Report Data, Psychophysiological Responses, Interpersonal Violence, and Morbid Jealousy

Christine R. Harris

Center for Brain & Cognition, University of California, San Diego

The specific innate modular theory of jealousy hypothesizes that natural selection shaped sexual jealousy as a mechanism to prevent cuckoldry, and emotional jealousy as a mechanism to prevent resource loss. Therefore, men should be primarily jealous over a mate's sexual infidelity and women over a mate's emotional infidelity. Five lines of evidence have been offered as support: self report responses, psychophysiological data, domestic violence (including spousal abuse and homicide), and morbid jealousy cases. This article reviews each line of evidence and finds only one hypothetical measure consistent with the hypothesis. This, however, is contradicted by a variety of other measures (including reported reactions to real infidelity). A meta-analysis of jealousy-inspired homicides, taking into account base rates for murder, found no evidence that jealousy disproportionately motivates men to kill. The findings are discussed from a social-cognitive theoretical perspective.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 102-128 (2003)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0702_102-128


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
G. E. Birnbaum, N. Svitelman, A. Bar-Shalom, and O. Porat
The Thin Line Between Reality and Imagination: Attachment Orientations and the Effects of Relationship Threats on Sexual Fantasies
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2008; 34(9): 1185 - 1199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. V. West, D. Popp, and D. A. Kenny
A Guide for the Estimation of Gender and Sexual Orientation Effects in Dyadic Data: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Approach
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2008; 34(3): 321 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
M. I. Berman and P. A. Frazier
Relationship Power and Betrayal Experience as Predictors of Reactions to Infidelity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2005; 31(12): 1617 - 1627.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. J. Sagarin
Reconsidering Evolved Sex Differences in Jealousy: Comment on Harris (2003)
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 62 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. R. Harris
Male and Female Jealousy, Still More Similar than Different: Reply to Sagarin (2005)
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2005; 9(1): 76 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social and Personal RelationshipsHome page
A. A. Fleischmann, B. H. Spitzberg, P. A. Andersen, and S. C. Roesch
Tickling the monster: Jealousy induction in relationships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 1, 2005; 22(1): 49 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. Sabini and M. C. Green
Emotional Responses to Sexual and Emotional Infidelity: Constants and Differences Across Genders, Samples, and Methods
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2004; 30(11): 1375 - 1388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
K. Hanko, S. Master, and J. Sabini
Some Evidence About Character and Mate Selection
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, June 1, 2004; 30(6): 732 - 742.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. L. Goldenberg, M. J. Landau, T. Pyszczynski, C. R. Cox, J. Greenberg, S. Solomon, and H. Dunnam
Gender-Typical Responses to Sexual and Emotional Infidelity as a Function of Mortality Salience Induced Self-Esteem Striving
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2003; 29(12): 1585 - 1595.
[Abstract] [PDF]