|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Review of Sex Differences in Sexual Jealousy, Including Self-Report Data, Psychophysiological Responses, Interpersonal Violence, and Morbid Jealousy
Christine R. Harris
Center for Brain & Cognition, University of California, San Diego
The specific innate modular theory of jealousy hypothesizes that natural selection shaped sexual jealousy as a mechanism to prevent cuckoldry, and emotional jealousy as a mechanism to prevent resource loss. Therefore, men should be primarily jealous over a mate's sexual infidelity and women over a mate's emotional infidelity. Five lines of evidence have been offered as support: self report responses, psychophysiological data, domestic violence (including spousal abuse and homicide), and morbid jealousy cases. This article reviews each line of evidence and finds only one hypothetical measure consistent with the hypothesis. This, however, is contradicted by a variety of other measures (including reported reactions to real infidelity). A meta-analysis of jealousy-inspired homicides, taking into account base rates for murder, found no evidence that jealousy disproportionately motivates men to kill. The findings are discussed from a social-cognitive theoretical perspective.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 2,
102-128 (2003)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0702_102-128

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Birnbaum, N. Svitelman, A. Bar-Shalom, and O. Porat
The Thin Line Between Reality and Imagination: Attachment Orientations and the Effects of Relationship Threats on Sexual Fantasies
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
September 1, 2008;
34(9):
1185 - 1199.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. V. West, D. Popp, and D. A. Kenny
A Guide for the Estimation of Gender and Sexual Orientation Effects in Dyadic Data: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model Approach
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2008;
34(3):
321 - 336.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Berman and P. A. Frazier
Relationship Power and Betrayal Experience as Predictors of Reactions to Infidelity
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2005;
31(12):
1617 - 1627.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Sagarin
Reconsidering Evolved Sex Differences in Jealousy: Comment on Harris (2003)
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2005;
9(1):
62 - 75.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Harris
Male and Female Jealousy, Still More Similar than Different: Reply to Sagarin (2005)
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2005;
9(1):
76 - 86.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Fleischmann, B. H. Spitzberg, P. A. Andersen, and S. C. Roesch
Tickling the monster: Jealousy induction in relationships
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,
February 1, 2005;
22(1):
49 - 73.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Sabini and M. C. Green
Emotional Responses to Sexual and Emotional Infidelity: Constants and Differences Across Genders, Samples, and Methods
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2004;
30(11):
1375 - 1388.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hanko, S. Master, and J. Sabini
Some Evidence About Character and Mate Selection
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
June 1, 2004;
30(6):
732 - 742.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Goldenberg, M. J. Landau, T. Pyszczynski, C. R. Cox, J. Greenberg, S. Solomon, and H. Dunnam
Gender-Typical Responses to Sexual and Emotional Infidelity as a Function of Mortality Salience Induced Self-Esteem Striving
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2003;
29(12):
1585 - 1595.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|