Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carver, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Scheier, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carver, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Scheier, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Control Processes and Self-Organization as Complementary Principles Underlying Behavior

Charles S. Carver

Department of Psychology, University of Miami

Michael F. Scheier

Deparment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University

This article addresses the convergence and complementarity between self-regulatory control-process models of behavior and dynamic systems models. The control-process view holds that people have a goal in mind and try to move toward it (or away from it), monitoring the extent to which a discrepancy remains between the goal and one's present state and taking steps to reduce the discrepancy (or enlarge it). Dynamic systems models tend to emphasize a bottom-up self-organization process, in which a coherence arises from among many simultaneous influences, moving the system toward attractors and away from repellers. We suggest that these differences in emphasis reflect two facets of a more complex reality involving both types of processes. Discussion focuses on how self-organization may occur within constituent elements of a feedback system—the input function, the output function, and goal values being used by the system—and how feedback processes themselves can reflect self-organizing tendencies.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 304-315 (2002)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_05


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
R. R. Vallacher, S. J. Read, and A. Nowak
The Dynamical Perspective in Personality and Social Psychology
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2002; 6(4): 264 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
R. R. Vallacher, A. Nowak, M. Froehlich, and M. Rockloff
The Dynamics of Self-Evaluation
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2002; 6(4): 370 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]