Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Holyoak, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simon, D.
Right arrow Articles by Holyoak, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 283-294 (2002)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_03

Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction

Dan Simon

University of Southern California, Law School

Keith J. Holyoak

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles

We first offer a brief review of the history of cognitive consistency theories in social psychology. After promising beginnings as an outgrowth of Gestalt theory, early consistency theories failed to yield a general account of the mechanisms by which attitudes are formed and decisions are made. However over the past decade the principles underlying consistency theories have been revived in the form of connectionist models of constraint satisfaction. We then review experimental work on complex legal decision making that illustrates how constraint satisfaction mechanisms can cause coherence shifts, thereby transforming ambiguous inputs into coherent decisions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 European Journal of Social TheoryHome page
B. Saferstein
Process Narratives, Grey Boxes, and Discourse Frameworks: Cognition, Interaction, and Constraint in Understanding Genetics and Medicine
European Journal of Social Theory, August 1, 2007; 10(3): 424 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
R. R. Vallacher, S. J. Read, and A. Nowak
The Dynamical Perspective in Personality and Social Psychology
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2002; 6(4): 264 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]