This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Potter, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Potter, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Experimenting with Reconciliation: A Comment on Jost and Kruglanski

Loughborough University

Constructionism, and specifically discursive psychology, has an enriched view of science rather than being against science. Whatever the political merits of experimentation, discursive psychologists have made specific criticisms with respect to the difficulty of capturing central features of social action and interaction using experiments. They have developed rigorous analytic techniques for the study of records of natural action. These avoid a number of the problems with experimental research and have the advantage of directly studying action located in its home settings. Social psychology would benefit if such work were both represented in, and engaged with, in APA journals.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 6, No. 3, 192-193 (2002)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_3


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?