|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion
Paul Rozin
Edward B. Royzman
Department of Psychology and Solomon Asch Center for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict, University of Pennsylvania
We hypothesize that there is a general bias, based on both innatepredispositions and experience, in animals and humans, to give greater weight to negative entities (e.g., events, objects, personal traits). This is manifested in 4 ways: (a) negative potency (negative entities are stronger than the equivalent positive entities), (b) steeper negative gradients (the negativity of negative events grows more rapidly with approach to them in space or time than does the positivity of positive events, (c) negativity dominance (combinations of negative and positive entities yield evaluations that are more negative than the algebraic sum of individual subjective valences would predict), and (d) negative differentiation (negative entities are more varied, yield more complex conceptual representations, and engage a wider response repertoire). We review evidence for this taxonomy, with emphasis on negativity dominance, including literary, historical, religious, and cultural sources, as well as the psychological literatures on learning, attention, impression formation, contagion, moral judgment, development, and memory. We then consider a variety of theoretical accounts for negativity bias. We suggest that 1 feature of negative events that make them dominant is that negative entities are more contagious than positive entities.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 4,
296-320 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Isaacowitz, E. S. Allard, N. A. Murphy, and M. Schlangel
The Time Course of Age-Related Preferences Toward Positive and Negative Stimuli
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci,
March 11, 2009;
(2009)
gbn036v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Todorov and A. D. Engell
The role of the amygdala in implicit evaluation of emotionally neutral faces
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci,
December 1, 2008;
3(4):
303 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Rafaeli, J. A. Cranford, A. S. Green, P. E. Shrout, and N. Bolger
The Good and Bad of Relationships: How Social Hindrance and Social Support Affect Relationship Feelings in Daily Life
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
December 1, 2008;
34(12):
1703 - 1718.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Weitzer, S. A. Tuch, and W. G. Skogan
Police-Community Relations in a Majority-Black City
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,
November 1, 2008;
45(4):
398 - 428.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Elliott, M. K. Beckett, D. E. Kanouse, K. Hambarsoomians, and S. Bernard
Problem-Oriented Reporting of CAHPS Consumer Evaluations of Health Care
Med Care Res Rev,
October 1, 2007;
64(5):
600 - 614.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. B. Johnson and C. Chess
Evaluating Public Responses to Environmental Trend Indicators
Science Communication,
September 1, 2006;
28(1):
64 - 92.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Berger1, E.-J. Lee, and J. T. Johnson
Gender, Rationality, and Base-Rate Explanations for Increasing Trends
Communication Research,
December 1, 2003;
30(6):
737 - 765.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Eiser, R. H. Fazio, T. Stafford, and T. J. Prescott
Connectionist Simulation of Attitude Learning: Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Positive and Negative Evaluations
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
October 1, 2003;
29(10):
1221 - 1235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Zebrowitz, J.-M. Fellous, A. Mignault, and C. Andreoletti
Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
August 1, 2003;
7(3):
194 - 215.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Berger
Effects of Discounting Cues and Gender on Apprehension: Quantitative Versus Verbal Depictions of Threatening Trends
Communication Research,
June 1, 2003;
30(3):
251 - 271.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Keller and D. Dauenheimer
Stereotype Threat in the Classroom: Dejection Mediates the Disrupting Threat Effect on Women's Math Performance
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
March 1, 2003;
29(3):
371 - 381.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|