This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rozin, P. Articles by Royzman, E. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rozin, P. Articles by Royzman, E. B. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion

Edward B. Royzman

Department of Psychology and Solomon Asch Center for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict, University of Pennsylvania

We hypothesize that there is a general bias, based on both innatepredispositions and experience, in animals and humans, to give greater weight to negative entities (e.g., events, objects, personal traits). This is manifested in 4 ways: (a) negative potency (negative entities are stronger than the equivalent positive entities), (b) steeper negative gradients (the negativity of negative events grows more rapidly with approach to them in space or time than does the positivity of positive events, (c) negativity dominance (combinations of negative and positive entities yield evaluations that are more negative than the algebraic sum of individual subjective valences would predict), and (d) negative differentiation (negative entities are more varied, yield more complex conceptual representations, and engage a wider response repertoire). We review evidence for this taxonomy, with emphasis on negativity dominance, including literary, historical, religious, and cultural sources, as well as the psychological literatures on learning, attention, impression formation, contagion, moral judgment, development, and memory. We then consider a variety of theoretical accounts for negativity bias. We suggest that 1 feature of negative events that make them dominant is that negative entities are more contagious than positive entities.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 4, 296-320 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Isaacowitz, E. S. Allard, N. A. Murphy, and M. Schlangel The Time Course of Age-Related Preferences Toward Positive and Negative Stimuli J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, March 11, 2009; (2009) gbn036v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Todorov and A. D. Engell The role of the amygdala in implicit evaluation of emotionally neutral faces Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, December 1, 2008; 3(4): 303 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Rafaeli, J. A. Cranford, A. S. Green, P. E. Shrout, and N. Bolger The Good and Bad of Relationships: How Social Hindrance and Social Support Affect Relationship Feelings in Daily Life Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2008; 34(12): 1703 - 1718. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Weitzer, S. A. Tuch, and W. G. Skogan Police-Community Relations in a Majority-Black City Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, November 1, 2008; 45(4): 398 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. N. Elliott, M. K. Beckett, D. E. Kanouse, K. Hambarsoomians, and S. Bernard Problem-Oriented Reporting of CAHPS Consumer Evaluations of Health Care Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2007; 64(5): 600 - 614. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. B. Johnson and C. Chess Evaluating Public Responses to Environmental Trend Indicators Science Communication, September 1, 2006; 28(1): 64 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Berger1, E.-J. Lee, and J. T. Johnson Gender, Rationality, and Base-Rate Explanations for Increasing Trends Communication Research, December 1, 2003; 30(6): 737 - 765. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Eiser, R. H. Fazio, T. Stafford, and T. J. Prescott Connectionist Simulation of Attitude Learning: Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Positive and Negative Evaluations Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1221 - 1235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Zebrowitz, J.-M. Fellous, A. Mignault, and C. Andreoletti Trait Impressions as Overgeneralized Responses to Adaptively Significant Facial Qualities: Evidence from Connectionist Modeling Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2003; 7(3): 194 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Berger Effects of Discounting Cues and Gender on Apprehension: Quantitative Versus Verbal Depictions of Threatening Trends Communication Research, June 1, 2003; 30(3): 251 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Keller and D. Dauenheimer Stereotype Threat in the Classroom: Dejection Mediates the Disrupting Threat Effect on Women's Math Performance Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2003; 29(3): 371 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]