Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, 184-200 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1

A Social Identity Theory of Leadership

Michael A. Hogg

School of Psychology University of Queensland

A social identity theory of leadership is described that views leadership as a group process generated by social categorization and prototype-based depersonalization processes associated with social identity. Group identification, as self-categorization, constructs an intragroup prototypicality gradient that invests the most prototypical member with the appearance of having influence; the appearance arises because members cognitively and behaviorally conform to the prototype. The appearance of influence becomes a reality through depersonalized social attraction processes that make followers agree and comply with the leader's ideas and suggestions. Consensual social attraction also imbues the leader with apparent status and creates a status-based structural differentiation within the group into leader(s) and followers, which has characteristics of unequal status intergroup relations. In addition, a fundamental attribution process constructs a charismatic leadership personality for the leader, which further empowers the leader and sharpens the leader-follower status differential. Empirical support for the theory is reviewed and a range of implications discussed, including intergroup dimensions, uncertainty reduction and extremism, power, and pitfalls of prototype-based leadership.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
D. J. Packer
On Being Both With Us and Against Us: A Normative Conflict Model of Dissent in Social Groups
Personality and Social Psychology Review, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 50 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
H. M. Zoller and G. T. Fairhurst
Resistance leadership: The overlooked potential in critical organization and leadership studies
Human Relations, September 1, 2007; 60(9): 1331 - 1360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
M. Dalton and D. Chrobot-Mason
A Theoretical Exploration of Manager and Employee Social Identity, Cultural Values and Identity Conflict Management
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2007; 7(2): 169 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LeadershipHome page
D. M. Carpenter II
Presidents of the United States on Leadership
Leadership, August 1, 2007; 3(3): 251 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
J. Jackson and J. Sunshine
Public Confidence in Policing: A Neo-Durkheimian Perspective
Br. J. Criminol., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 214 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. Van Vugt
Evolutionary Origins of Leadership and Followership
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 354 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
B. Lickel, N. Miller, D. M. Stenstrom, T. F. Denson, and T. Schmader
Vicarious Retribution: The Role of Collective Blame in Intergroup Aggression
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2006; 10(4): 372 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
S. Shivers-Blackwell
The Influence of Perceptions of Organizational Structure & Culture on Leadership Role Requirements: The Moderating Impact of Locus of Control & Self-Monitoring
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2006; 12(4): 27 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
L. Pittaway, O. Rivera, and A. Murphy
Social Identity and Leadership in the Basque Region: A Study of Leadership Development Programmes
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2005; 11(3): 17 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. J. Hornsey and J. Jetten
The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2004; 8(3): 248 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
J. H. Humphreys and W. O. Einstein
Leadership and Temperament Congruence: Extending the Expectancy Model of Work Motivation
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2004; 10(4): 58 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
H. S. Slay
Spanning Two Worlds: Social Identity and Emergent African-American Leaders
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2003; 9(4): 56 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]