This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Levy, S. R. Articles by Dweck, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Levy, S. R. Articles by Dweck, C. S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Static Versus Dynamic Theories and the Perception of Groups: Different Routes to Different Destinations

Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook

Jason E. Plaks

Department of Psychology, University of Washington

Ying-yi Hong

Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Chi-yue Chiu

Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong

Carol S. Dweck

Department of Psychology, Columbia University

Research on lay theories suggests that people who begin the task of social perception with different starting assumptions follow different cognitive paths and reach different social endpoints. In this article, we show how laypeople's fixed (entity) versus dynamic (incremental) theories of human nature foster different meaning systems for interpreting and respondingto the same group information. Using research with adults and children, in the United States and East Asia, and concerning familiar and novel groups, wedocument how these theories influence susceptibility to stereotyping, perceptions of group homogeneity, the ultimate attribution error, intergroup bias,and discriminatory behavior. Further, we discuss social-cultural factors that produce and perpetuate these theories as well as why and when these theories are maintained and changed. The implications of this work for reducing stereotyping and intergroup conflict are considered.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. K. Poon and D. J. Koehler Person Theories: Their Temporal Stability and Relation to Intertrait Inferences Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 965 - 977. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Fischer, T. Greitemeyer, and A. Kastenmuller What Do We Think About Muslims? The Validity of Westerners' Implicit Theories About the Associations Between Muslims' Religiosity, Religious Identity, Aggression Potential, and Attitudes Toward Terrorism Group Processes Intergroup Relations, July 1, 2007; 10(3): 373 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Kelly and J. R. Spoor Naive Theories About the Effects of Mood in Groups: A Preliminary Investigation Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 203 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Friedman, M. L. Cooper, M. R. Chladek, and D. Rudy Investigating the Link Between Validation Seeking and Lay Dispositionism Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2007; 33(4): 463 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Rydell, K. Hugenberg, D. Ray, and D. M. Mackie Implicit Theories About Groups and Stereotyping: The Role of Group Entitativity Pers Soc Psychol Bull, April 1, 2007; 33(4): 549 - 558. [Abstract] [PDF]