|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Interplay of Subjective Essentialism and Entitativity in the Formation of Stereotypes
Vincent Yzerbyt
Olivier Corneille
Claudia Estrada
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
In line with our subjective essentialist view of stereotypes (Yzerbyt, Rocher, & Schadron, 1997), we propose that two classes of factors that mutually reinforce each other influence the perception of groups. The perception of a strong level of similarity and organization among group members (i.e., group entitativity) suggests the existence of a deep essence that would account for the detected regularities. Conversely, the existence of naïve theories regarding the presence of an underlying core encourages the search for resemblances and connections within the group. After a short presentation of the recent literature dealing with the concepts of entitativity and essentialism, we review a series of studies from our laboratory showing the impact of entitativity on essentialism as well as the influence of essentialism on entitativity. We also provide empirical evidence for this bidirectional process from both the outsider and the insider perspective. Finally, we examine the potential role of cultural differences both in the ascription of a fundamental nature to an entitative assembly of people and in the use of a priori naïve theories to create surface similarity among group members. As a set, these efforts point to the importance of taking into account the constant dialogue between perceiver's theory-based explanations and group member's perceptual characteristics if one wishes to understand group stereotypes.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 2,
141-155 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_5
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. D. Henderson
Psychological Distance and Group Judgments: The Effect of Physical Distance on Beliefs about Common Goals
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
October 1, 2009;
35(10):
1330 - 1341.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. A. Morton and T. Postmes
When Differences Become Essential: Minority Essentialism in Response to Majority Treatment
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
May 1, 2009;
35(5):
656 - 668.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Jackson
Reactions to Social Dilemmas as a Function of Group Identity, Rational Calculations, and Social Context
Small Group Research,
December 1, 2008;
39(6):
673 - 705.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. M. Stenstrom, B. Lickel, T. F. Denson, and N. Miller
The Roles of Ingroup Identification and Outgroup Entitativity in Intergroup Retribution
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
November 1, 2008;
34(11):
1570 - 1582.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Kelly and J. R. Spoor
Naive Theories About the Effects of Mood in Groups: A Preliminary Investigation
Group Processes Intergroup Relations,
April 1, 2007;
10(2):
203 - 222.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Lickel, N. Miller, D. M. Stenstrom, T. F. Denson, and T. Schmader
Vicarious Retribution: The Role of Collective Blame in Intergroup Aggression
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
November 1, 2006;
10(4):
372 - 390.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B. Cohen, D. E. Hall, H. G. Koenig, and K. G. Meador
Social Versus Individual Motivation: Implications for Normative Definitions of Religious Orientation
Personality and Social Psychology Review,
February 1, 2005;
9(1):
48 - 61.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Lickel, T. Schmader, and D. L. Hamilton
A Case of Collective Responsibility: Who Else Was to Blame for the Columbine High School Shootings?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
February 1, 2003;
29(2):
194 - 204.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
