This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Helweg-Larsen, M. Articles by Shepperd, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Helweg-Larsen, M. Articles by Shepperd, J. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do Moderators of the Optimistic Bias Affect Personal or Target Risk Estimates? A Review of the Literature

Department of Psychology, Transylvania University

James A. Shepperd

Department of Psychology, University of Florida

The optimistic bias is defined as judging one's own risk as less than the risk of others. Researchers have identified numerous personal and situational factors that moderate the extent to which people display the bias. It is unclear, however, whether these moderators affect the bias by influencing people's personal risk estimates or their risk estimates for a target. A review of moderators of the optimistic bias reveals evidence for both influences. Moderators associated with negative affect (negative mood, dysphoria, trait and state anxiety, event severity, and proximity of feedback) and control related moderators (perceived control and prior experience) appear primarily to affect personal risk estimates. Positive mood affects target risk estimates. Finally, moderators that surround the comparison process appear to have different effects. Specifically, the type of comparison target appears to affect target risk estimates, whereas attention to personal risk-related behaviors affects personal risk estimates.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, 74-95 (2001)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_5


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Spittal, J. McClure, R. J. Siegert, and F. H. Walkey Predictors of Two Types of Earthquake Preparation: Survival Activities and Mitigation Activities Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2008; 40(6): 798 - 817. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. P. Boyle, D. M. McLeod, and H. Rojas The Role of Ego Enhancement and Perceived Message Exposure in Third-Person Judgments Concerning Violent Video Games American Behavioral Scientist, October 1, 2008; 52(2): 165 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Ran Wei, V.-H. Lo, and H.-Y. Lu Reconsidering the Relationship Between the Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Communication Research, December 1, 2007; 34(6): 665 - 684. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 147 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Meirick Self-Enhancement Motivation as a Third Variable in the Relationship Between First- and Third-Person Effects Int. J. Public Opin. Res., December 1, 2005; 17(4): 473 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Shepperd, M. Helweg-Larsen, and L. Ortega Are Comparative Risk Judgments Consistent Across Time and Events? Pers Soc Psychol Bull, September 1, 2003; 29(9): 1169 - 1180. [Abstract] [PDF]