Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Personality and Social Psychology Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vignoles, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Breakwell, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vignoles, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Breakwell, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Distinctiveness Principle: Identity, Meaning, and the Bounds of Cultural Relativity

Vivian L. Vignoles

Xenia Chryssochoou

Glynis M. Breakwell

Social Psychology European Research Institute, University of Surrey, Guildford, England

Extending theories of distinctiveness motivation in identity (Breakwell, 1987; Brewer, 1991; Snyder & Fromkin, 1980), we discuss the precise role of distinctiveness in identity processes and the cross-cultural generality of the distinctiveness principle. We argue that (a) within Western cultures, distinctiveness is necessaryfor the construction of meaning within identity, and (b) the distinctiveness principle is not incompatible with non-Western cultural systems. We propose a distinction among three sources of distinctiveness: position, difference, and separateness, with different implications for identity and behavior. These sources coexist within cultures, on both individual and group levels of selfrepresentation, but they may be emphasized differently according to culture and context.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, 337-354 (2000)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_4
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Spears, N. Ellemers, and B. Doosje
Strength in Numbers or Less Is More? A Matter of Opinion and a Question of Taste
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2009; 35(8): 1099 - 1111.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
R. Imhoff and H.-P. Erb
What Motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness Seeking Blocks Majority Influence
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 309 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
M. J. Hornsey and J. Jetten
The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different
Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2004; 8(3): 248 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]