This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tesser, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Tesser, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On the Confluence of Self-Esteem Maintenance Mechanisms

Department of Psychology The Ohio State University

A case is made for the substitutability of self-esteem regulation mechanisms such as cognitive dissonance reduction, self-affirmation, and social comparison. For example, a threat to self via cognitive dissonance might be reduced by a favorable social comparison outcome. To explain substitution, it is suggested that self-esteem regulation mechanisms inevitably produce affect and that affect mediates the completion of various self-esteem regulation processes. Substitution can be understood in terms of the transfer of affect from the initial mechanism to the substitute mechanism. To be effective, this transfer must take place without awareness. Also discussed is the substitution of self-esteem regulation mechanisms across different self-domains versus within a single self-domain. Current theory suggests that substitution might be more effective within domain; that is, it is better to bolster the aspect of self that has been threatened. It is suggested here, however, that substitution across self-domain might be relatively resilient and easier to accomplish.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, 290-299 (2000)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0404_1


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. C. Blackhart, B. C. Nelson, M. L. Knowles, and R. F. Baumeister Rejection Elicits Emotional Reactions but Neither Causes Immediate Distress nor Lowers Self-Esteem: A Meta-Analytic Review of 192 Studies on Social Exclusion Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2009; 13(4): 269 - 309. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. D. Nussbaum and C. S. Dweck Defensiveness Versus Remediation: Self-Theories and Modes of Self-Esteem Maintenance Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2008; 34(5): 599 - 612. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Brinol, R. E. Petty, I. Gallardo, and K. G. DeMarree The Effect of Self-Affirmation in Nonthreatening Persuasion Domains: Timing Affects the Process Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2007; 33(11): 1533 - 1546. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Heine, T. Proulx, and K. D. Vohs The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social Motivations Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2006; 10(2): 88 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Schimel, J. Greenberg, and A. Martens Evidence that Projection of a Feared Trait can Serve a Defensive Function Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2003; 29(8): 969 - 979. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Stone Self-Consistency for Low Self-Esteem in Dissonance Processes: The Role of Self-Standards Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2003; 29(7): 846 - 858. [Abstract] [PDF]