This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fiske, A. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fiske, A. P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Complementarity Theory: Why Human Social Capacities Evolved to Require Cultural Complements

Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles

This article introduces complementarity theory, which explains the psychology of cultural diversity as a product of evolved social proclivities that enable—and require—people to coordinate action in culture-specific ways. The theory presents evolutionary processes and psychological mechanisms that may account for the cultural variability of social coordination devices such as language, relational models, rituals, moral interpretations of misfortune, taboos, religion, marriage, and descent systems. Human fitness and well-being depend on social coordination characterized by complementarity among the participants' actions. This complementarity is based primarily on coordination devices derived from the conjunction of cultural paradigms and specific, highly structured, evolved proclivities. The proclivities have no adaptive value without the paradigms, and the paradigms have no meaning without the proclivities. They are coadapted to function together. Operating in conjunction with each other, proclivities and paradigms jointly define the generative structures for meaningful coordination of social interaction in each particular culture.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 76-94 (2000)
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_7


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. T. Reis Reinvigorating the Concept of Situation in Social Psychology Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2008; 12(4): 311 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Estes and Jia Wang Integrative Literature Review: Workplace Incivility: Impacts on Individual and Organizational Performance Human Resource Development Review, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 218 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. B. Brewer Taking the Social Origins of Human Nature Seriously: Toward a More Imperialist Social Psychology Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2004; 8(2): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [PDF]