This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lee Hamilton, V. Articles by Sanders, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee Hamilton, V. Articles by Sanders, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Second Face of Evil: Wrongdoing in and by the Corporation

Sociology Department, University of Maryland

Joseph Sanders

Law School, University of Houston

The second face of evil is hurtful, rather than malevolent. We argue that this is likely to be the form of wrongdoing characteristic of corporate actors. This article views the corporation at 3 levels: the individual self-interested actors within it, the individual actors who respond to their hierarchical position, and the hierarchy (corporation) it-self Research shows that action inside complex organizations such as corporations is not necessarily more rational and informed by greater foresight than individual actions, but several studies indicate that individuals hold organizations to a higher level of responsibility than individuals committing similar acts, and they do so in part because they perceive organizations to enjoy greater foresight. We address this paradox by suggesting that future research address how the corporation 's obligations to foresee consequences and the sheer, primitive consequences themselves may shape perceptions of corporate foreseeability.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, 222-233 (1999)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_5


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?