Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feather, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feather, N. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, 86-107 (1999)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1
© 1999 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Judgments of Deservingness: Studies in the Psychology of Justice and Achievement

N. T. Feather

School of Psychology The Flinders University of South Australia

This article presents a review and conceptual analysis of the concept of deservingness that incorporates the effects of personal values, perceived responsibility, ingroup-outgroup relations, and like-dislike relations. Selected studies show that reactions to another's success or failure and to the rise or fall of "tall poppies" or high achievers depends on the degree to which the positive or negative outcome is seen to be deserved; that individual differences in personal values and in value syndromes may be assumed to affect deservingness via the subjective values assigned to actions and outcomes; that group membership, status, interpersonal liking-disliking, and perceived moral character also affect judgments of deservingness; and that deservingness is a key variable that mediates how observers react to penalties imposed on the perpetrators of different kinds of offense. It is argued that the inclusion of deservingness goes beyond approaches in which perceived responsibility is accorded central status by adding a further link in the causal chain, thus enabling a more complete consideration of the effects of justice and value variables on how people react to positive and negative outcomes for both self and other.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Culture PsychologyHome page
H. Joffe and C. Staerkle
The Centrality of the Self-Control Ethos in Western Aspersions Regarding Outgroups: A Social Representational Approach to Stereotype Content
Culture Psychology, December 1, 2007; 13(4): 395 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
J. A. Vandello, N. P. Goldschmied, and D. A. R. Richards
The Appeal of the Underdog
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2007; 33(12): 1603 - 1616.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
J. M. Falomir-Pichastor, C. Staerkle, M.-A. Depuiset, and F. Butera
Perceived Legitimacy of Collective Punishment as a Function of Democratic versus Non-Democratic Group Structure
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 565 - 579.
[Abstract] [PDF]