This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Malle, B. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Malle, B. F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework

Department of Psychology, University of Oregon

This article presents a theoretical framework of how people explain behavior. The framework, based on the folk concept of intentionality, distinguishes two major modes of explanation—reason explanation and cause explanation—as well as two minor modes and identifies conditions under which they occur. Three studies provide empirical support for these distinctions. As part of the framework, a detailed model of people's reason explanations is developed, which emphasizes the unique conceptual and linguistic features of reasons. This model points to limitations of traditional attribution concepts, which are examined theoretically and empirically. Finally, the theoretical framework incorporates attribution concepts, which apply to some but not all modes of explanation. Several paths for future research are outlined—on novel topics such as the roles of rationality and subjectivity in explanations and on classic topics such as the actor-observer asymmetry and the self-serving bias.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, 23-48 (1999)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0301_2


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. G. Woodside and D. Martin Applying Ecological Systems and Micro-Tipping Point Theory for Understanding Tourists' Leisure Destination Behavior Journal of Travel Research, August 1, 2008; 47(1): 14 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Nolan, P. W. Schultz, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius Normative Social Influence is Underdetected Pers Soc Psychol Bull, July 1, 2008; 34(7): 913 - 923. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. F. Mason and C. N. Macrae Perspective-Taking from a Social Neuroscience Standpoint Group Processes Intergroup Relations, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 215 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Haslam Dehumanization: An Integrative Review Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2006; 10(3): 252 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Marshall and J. D. Brown Trait Aggressiveness and Situational Provocation: A Test of the Traits as Situational Sensitivities (TASS) Model Pers Soc Psychol Bull, August 1, 2006; 32(8): 1100 - 1113. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. J. Miresco and L. J. Kirmayer The Persistence of Mind-Brain Dualism in Psychiatric Reasoning About Clinical Scenarios Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 163(5): 913 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chen Psychological-State Theories about Significant Others: Implications for the Content and Structure of Significant-Other Representations Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2003; 29(10): 1285 - 1302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. D. Fincham Child Abuse: An Attribution Perspective Child Maltreat, February 1, 2002; 7(1): 76 - 80. [PDF]

				M. W. Morris, T. Menon, and D. R. Ames Culturally Conferred Conceptions of Agency: A Key to Social Perception of Persons, Groups, and Other Actors Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2001; 5(2): 169 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]