This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Jost, J. T. Articles by Nelson, T. O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jost, J. T. Articles by Nelson, T. O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Metacognition: An Expansionist Review

Graduate School of Business, Stanford University

Arie W. Kruglanski

Thomas O. Nelson

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland at College Park

In this article we review recent social psychological contributions to the metacognitive movement. It is argued that social psychologists have long contributed to the study of "thinking about thinking," even though their work has not yet been recognized as metacognitive. The present "expansionist" survey suggests that the domain of social metacognition should include (a) beliefs about one's own mental states and processes as well as beliefs about those of other people, (b) momentary sensations as well as enduring folk theories, and (c) descriptive beliefs about how the mind works and normative beliefs about how it ought to work. The contents and origins of metacognition are inherently social; at the same time, metacognitions are comprised of cognitive elements and are governed by the principles and laws applicable to human thinking in general. Accordingly, whereas metacognitions about self-knowledge may be derived from different informational sources than metacognitions about other people, the processes whereby different types of metacognitions are formed, activated, and applied are essentially the same. Focusing on the social nature of metacognition and the profound relevance of cultural expectations on cognitive performance makes clear the benefits of systematically exploring the cognitive-social interface in reference to metacognitive phenomena.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 2, No. 2, 137-154 (1998)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Schmader, C. E. Forbes, Shen Zhang, and W. Berry Mendes A Metacognitive Perspective on the Cognitive Deficits Experienced in Intellectually Threatening Environments Pers Soc Psychol Bull, May 1, 2009; 35(5): 584 - 596. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Rink and N. Ellemers What Can You Expect? The Influence of Gender Diversity in Dyads on Work Goal Expectancies and Subsequent Work Commitment Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 577 - 588. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. L. Tormala and R. E. Petty Resistance to Persuasion and Attitude Certainty: The Moderating Role of Elaboration Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2004; 30(11): 1446 - 1457. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Jost and A. W. Kruglanski The Estrangement of Social Constructionism and Experimental Social Psychology: History of the Rift and Prospects for Reconciliation Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 2002; 6(3): 168 - 187. [Abstract] [PDF]