Personality and Social Psychology Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haselton, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nettle, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haselton, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Nettle, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 10, No. 1, 47-66 (2006)
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
© 2006 Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

The Paranoid Optimist: An Integrative Evolutionary Model of Cognitive Biases

Martie G. Haselton

Communication Studies and Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles

Daniel Nettle

Psychology, Brain and Behaviour, University of Newcastle

Human cognition is often biased, from judgments of the time of impact of approaching objects all the way through to estimations of social outcomes in the future. We propose these effects and a host of others may all be understood from an evolutionary psychological perspective. In this article, we elaborate error management theory (EMT; Haselton & Buss, 2000). EMT predicts that if judgments are made under uncertainty, and the costs of false positive and false negative errors have been asymmetric over evolutionary history, selection should have favored a bias toward making the least costly error. This perspective integrates a diverse array of effects under a single explanatory umbrella, and it yields new content-specific predictions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Arzy, I. Molnar-Szakacs, and O. Blanke
Self in Time: Imagined Self-Location Influences Neural Activity Related to Mental Time Travel
J. Neurosci., June 18, 2008; 28(25): 6502 - 6507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
J. M. Ackerman and D. T. Kenrick
The Costs of Benefits: Help-Refusals Highlight Key Trade-Offs of Social Life
Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2008; 12(2): 118 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]