This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kelley, H. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kelley, H. H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The "Stimulus Field" for Interpersonal Phenomena: The Source of Language and Thought About Interpersonal Events

Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles

This article introduces the concept of "stimulus field" and describes the role it plays in understanding common thought and language. A stimulus field specifies the psychophysical reality of any particular domain of phenomena. Consistent with various writings in "ecological psychology," this article proposes that cognition about interpersonal phenomena is adapted to the stimulus field of those phenomena and, therefore, that our understanding of the relevant thoughts and language should specify and take account of that reality. The central assumption of this article is that, in the absence of knowing the true stimulus field for interpersonal phenomena, interdependence theory can fruitfully serve as a provisional specification of that field. After an overview of interdependence theory, this article summarizes some of the implications of this strategy. It shows that the theory helps us understand some of the presently known facts about the cognition of interpersonal phenomena and suggests hypotheses about other features of such cognitions. It highlights the abstract level at which interpersonal events are often viewed and identifies advantages and disadvantages of such thought. It suggests the basic terms in which schematic representations of interpersonal relations are cast. It suggests the bases in the stimulus field for the distinctions that people make between "person," "situation," and "interaction" and for the differentiations they make within each of those broad categories. At the same time, it shows why these distinctions are often blurred, identifies the connections in the stimulusfield that underlie the implicit meanings of words and the stories people construct, and illustrates how the various connections enter into common assumptions and attributions.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Halevy, L. Sagiv, S. Roccas, and G. Bornstein Perceiving Intergroup Conflict: From Game Models to Mental Templates. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, December 1, 2006; 32(12): 1674 - 1689. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. G. Holmes The Benefits of Abstract Functional Analysis in Theory Construction: The Case of Interdependence Theory Personality and Social Psychology Review, May 1, 2004; 8(2): 146 - 155. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. A. Zebrowitz and M. A. Collins Accurate Social Perception at Zero Acquaintance: The Affordances of a Gibsonian Approach Personality and Social Psychology Review, August 1, 1997; 1(3): 204 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF]